1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artyom0805 [142]
1 year ago
15

Write a short note on civil disobedience movement​

History
1 answer:
anyanavicka [17]1 year ago
7 0

The Civil Disobedience Movement played a significant role and spread the message of full and complete independence of India. People all over took part in it ---- including women and students. Gandhi along with Vallabhbhai Patel were arrested. Moreover the government ----

  1. Took forcible possession of the Congress office.
  2. Lathi charges were common to disperse the crowds.
  3. Whipping became a common punishment.
  4. Freedom of press was curtailed.
  5. Nationalist literature ---- poems, stories and novels were banned in a large scale.

Yet, the movement continued to linger on. Gandhi was still in jail when the 'Communal Award' was announced in August 1932, by British PM Ramsay MacDonald. The award declared the depressed classes also to be minorities and thus separated them from the rest of Hindus. Gandhi took 'fast unto death' in its protest. Feelings of frustration set in people and political enthusiasm became less and less. Gandhi still succeeded in amending the Communal Award in accordance with the Poona Pact (1932) by which the depressed classes were to have joint electorates with other Hindus.

Eventually, the Civil Disobedience Movement was suspended in May 1933 and completely withdrawn in May 1934.

Hope it help you

You might be interested in
Ogdei was the immediate successor to
rosijanka [135]
Are you talking about Ogdei Khan? Because he was the successor of  Tolui.
Contact me if that wasn't it.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The politicians who met at the Hartford Convention in 1814
irga5000 [103]
The head of Hartford Convention was Harrison Gray Otis. Besides him there were 25 other participants:

George Cabot
Benjamin Hazard
Benjamin West
Calvin Goddard
Chauncey Goodrich
Daniel Lyman
Daniel Waldo
Edward Manton
George Bliss
Hodijah Baylies
James Hillhouse
John Treadwell
Joseph S. Lyman
Joshua Thomas
Mills Olcott
Nathan Dane
Nathaniel Smith
Roger Minott Sherman
Samuel Sumner Wilde
Samuel Ward, Jr.
Stephen Longfellow, Jr.
Timothy Bigelow
William Hall, Jr.
William Prescott, Jr.
Zephaniah Swift
6 0
3 years ago
Friedan specifically discusses the birthrate of college women?
Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

A triangle is shown Below based on this triangle which one of the following statements is true

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What are some potential benefits and potential costs of total war, and do the potential benefits ever outweigh the costs ?
dimaraw [331]

The concept of "total war" refers to a type of armed conflict that is bound by no rules or limitations in terms of who is being attacked, the weapons that are used or the elements of society that will be sacrificed to win it.

Engaging in this type of war can have some benefits, such as:

  • There is no need for the government to define its objectives clearly.
  • Because of it, there is no accountability between the government and its citizens, which gives them free reign of action.
  • Countries with a strong military can use their full power.

However, the costs far outweigh the benefits:

  • Increased cost of human lives, from all parties involved.
  • The destruction of all civil society.
  • Because civil society is so disrupted, government institutions are likely to collapse as well.
  • Extremely difficult recovery process, both politically as economically.
  • Complete depletion of the country's resources.
  • Violation of human rights and the laws of just war.
  • Closes the door to any peaceful solution.

There is rarely, if ever, a situation in which a total war provides benefits that would outweigh the costs of it, or that would not be achieved through some other means.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ffgeffefefefefefefefefefe
Contact [7]

Answer:

Power divided between the state and federal government.

Explanation:

The national government would have control over the broader area of concern. The state government would have control over deciding how to handle smaller, more local, and more specific concerns within that broad area.

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • What was king philips war?
    14·1 answer
  • During the revolutionary war, a massachusetts group of women accused a merchant of hoarding coffee. the group took matters into
    11·1 answer
  • Earth's climate systems are driven by the electromagnetic radiation from the Sun as well as Its Reflection absorption storage an
    12·1 answer
  • How are people changed by war
    12·2 answers
  • 2. How did the Munich Pact affect Germany? Why was the agreement made?
    14·1 answer
  • The ____ were the first europeans to counter north americans
    8·1 answer
  • How many times have u.s. presidents sent troops abroad without the authorization of congress?
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the military and cultural factors that led to the Mongol conquests of China and the Muslim kingdoms. Include what you r
    15·1 answer
  • Question 7(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
    9·1 answer
  • What business practices contributed most to Andrew Carnegie’s ability to form a monopoly?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!