Several factors came together. Europe had a population that was on average richer than most other cultures. A very competitive commercial class, ships that were superior than other cultures, developed for the rough North Atlantic, and a number of competitive states rather than a single empire.
The British, Chinese, Russian, and all those countries on the other side considered this a “new world” but the natives would have taken offense because it wasn’t actually new, they had been living there for a while.
Hope this helps!!!
<u>Difference between geographic expansion in New England and in the Chesapeake region:</u>
<u>New England:</u>
- New Englanders as a result of rough soil had constrained cultivating so they needed to go to timber, hide, and angling.
-
Homesteaders in the New England settlements suffered harshly cool winters and mellow summers.
-
The land was level near the coastline yet turned out to be bumpy and rugged more remote inland.
-
The dirt was commonly rough, making cultivating troublesome.
<u>
Chesapeake region:</u>
- The Chesapeake district was, be that as it may, extremely wealthy in soil, and cultivating turned into the primary concern.
- Tobacco, indigo, and rice were the central yields.
-
Religion in the Chesapeake district was not in any manner normal, with the exception of in a couple of zones.
-
The reaction expresses that pioneers in the Chesapeake were increasingly "socialized" with the Indians.
- The province of Maryland was expected as an asylum for Catholics in the wake of being abused when the Catholic Church isolated from the Church of England.
Explanation:
Asimov's thesis is that the beauty of science is the same as the beauty of nature. He expands on this theory with a grandeur explanation of the vast happenings in nature and the universe, such as the speed of light and sound, and the truth that the stars are really amazingly large suns like our own.
Answer
The aspect of Bias Idea.
Explanation
Those who are biased tend to believe what they want to believe thus they dont put other peoples opinions into consideration. Generally people who re biased have inclination towards their thinking often based on how they are raised. So when you hear someone from a national energy company argue that a new natural-gas drill site will not be environmentally damaging and will produce many jobs in the community this aspect is in a view of bias idea. You should most definitely consider the bias of this person's claim. He or she makes a living off of natural gas drilling, and is therefore likely to hide certain facts for their own personal gain. This makes him stand to his opinion that the gas will not harm the environment which is not true. This is because he/she is after his/her own benefits.
MARK ME BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!!!!!!!
