1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
2 years ago
8

Should american government leaders be condemned for the way they took the Inians land away?

History
1 answer:
Nuetrik [128]2 years ago
8 0

Yes the American government has to be condemned for the way that they took the lands of the Indians.

<h3>Why the Americans took Indian lands</h3>

The Americans due to the need for Westward expansion felt that they were in a place that was their birthright.

They felt that they should be the owners because God has given them the areas. Hence they pushed the original land owners away from their properties.

Read more on Westward expansion here:

brainly.com/question/245803

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
In arizona v. evans (l995), the u.s. supreme court refused to apply the exclusionary rule because:
murzikaleks [220]
<span>In Arizona v. Evans (l995), the u.s. supreme court refused to apply the exclusionary rule because:
</span>
The error was made by clerical employees of the court.
4 0
3 years ago
Which group of people were the Nazis more likely to send to a euthanizing camp?
tino4ka555 [31]

Answer:

people who opposed hitler

4 0
3 years ago
What were all ancient Greek citizens required to do
ipn [44]

Answer:

Ion know........................

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
_______the man who led the unification process in germany. he was removed from power by kaiser wilhelm
dsp73
I believe the blank is Otto von Bismark
4 0
4 years ago
Briefly explain the Bosnian Crisis. Austria-Hungary took over part of a Turkish province in Bosnia. This outraged Serbians who f
kicyunya [14]

Answer:

Bosnian crisis of 1908, state of severe international tension caused by the annexation by Austria-Hungary of the Balkan provinces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Congress of Berlin (1878) had given Austria-Hungary the right to occupy and administer Bosnia and Herzegovina temporarily, but the provinces officially remained possessions of the Ottoman Empire. Still, the Austrian administration tried mightily and at great expense to improve the strategically valuable region economically and to link it closely with Austria-Hungary. When in July 1908 the Young Turks staged a revolution in Constantinople (now Istanbul), established a constitutional government, and inaugurated a reform program, the Austrian foreign minister Graf (count) Lexa von Aehrenthal resolved to annex Bosnia and Herzegovina before the new Turkish regime could regain control over them.

To that end Aehrenthal met the Russian foreign minister, Aleksandr P. Izvolsky, at Buchlau, in Moravia; and, on Sept. 16, 1908, Izvolsky agreed that Russia would not object to the annexation. Aehrenthal pledged that in return Austria would not object to opening the Bosporus and Dardanelles straits to Russian warships, an advantage that had been denied to Russia since 1841. By a rescript of Oct. 7, 1908, Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Izvolsky, unprepared for such immediate action, could not control the strong popular opposition to the annexation that developed in Russia. Furthermore, Serbia, which was closely related to Bosnia and Herzegovina geographically and ethnically, was outraged by the annexation. It demanded that Austria cede a portion of Bosnia and Herzegovina to Serbia, and Izvolsky, pressed by anti-Austrian opinion in Russia, was forced to support the Serbian claims. Austria, however, firmly supported by its ally Germany, threatened to invade Serbia if that country persisted in its demands. Russia, having failed to secure equally strong support from its ally France, could not risk a war against both Austria-Hungary and Germany for Serbia’s sake, and in March 1909 Izvolsky notified Germany that Russia accepted Austria’s annexation. Although the crisis was resolved without immediate warfare, the resulting embittered relations between Serbia and Austria-Hungary and Russia’s resentment at having been deceived and humiliated contributed to the outbreak of World War I.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP (a) What is considered Greek drama?
    15·1 answer
  • In South Texas, the Texas Rangers were said to be ruthless toward
    6·1 answer
  • Who was narmer and what were his major accomplishments
    15·2 answers
  • In addition to the Jews, which other groups of people were targeted? (6 types)
    12·2 answers
  • Study this 14th-century Persian image of the human venous system. Based on this image, it would be reasonable to conclude that _
    15·2 answers
  • The ottoman and mughal empires had which characteristic in common
    8·2 answers
  • How did Judaism affect Christianity
    11·1 answer
  • How many Anglo-Saxon kingdoms were there in modern-day England?
    14·2 answers
  • Who was the famous inventor in new york during the 1800's?
    14·2 answers
  • Based on the excerpt, what was a major factor that led the colonists to rebel against the British government?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!