The evidence that only suggests your claim and requires you to make inferences to connect it with your analysis is D. Implicit.
<h3>What is an implicit evidence?</h3>
It should be noted that an implicit evidence simply means an evidence that's not clearly stated but understood because of the clues.
In this case, the evidence that only suggests your claim and requires you to make inferences to connect it with your analysis is implicit.
Learn more about evidence on:
brainly.com/question/1256677
#SPJ1
Answer:
The idea that is conveyed in both "dust of snow" and "who knows if the moon’s" is Nature can be mysterious.
Explanation:
The question is not complete since it does not provide the options to answer it, here are the options:
* Nature can be playful.
* Nature can be harsh.
* Nature can be annoying.
* Nature can be mysterious.
The poems "dust of snow" by Robert Frost and "who knows if the moon’s" by Edward Estlin C u m m i n g s describe different things in nature but with the same mystery tone, as frost talks about the interaction between a crow, nature and a human while C u m m i n g s talks about the moon, as they develop the descriptive lines they give incredible powers of wonder to the elements in their work.
Answer:
he thought he couldn't die
his parachute didn't work
because the parachute didn't work and he was going to Land on his face
a hawk came by and plucked him with his razor claws
I'm guessing this but I think it means that certain place? sorry if it's not right :(
Answer:
The visitors to the farm walked through the corn maze, and then they bought a pumpkin.
Explanation:
Firstly, let's see if all the revised sentences make grammatical sense.
1. The visitors to the farm walked through the corn maze, and then they bought a pumpkin.
Sentence one is grammatically correct as it uses and to connect the two clauses.
2. The visitors to the farm walked through the corn maze; bought a pumpkin.
Sentence two is not grammatically correct as it has an unnecessary semi-colon with a dependent clause.
3. The visitors to the farm walked through the corn maze, they bought a pumpkin.
Sentence three does not use and to join the two clauses.
4. The visitors to the farm walked through the corn maze; and then they bought a pumpkin.
Sentence four like sentence two uses an unnecessary semi-colon that does not follow the semi-colon rule.
A semi colon should be used to join two independent clauses or to replace (and, or, but,etc)
Hope it isn't confusing, and it helped! :))
