This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.
Read:
A Mom Sues Nutella Maker For Deceptive Advertising
By Whitney Blair Wyckoff
Which statement is not Whitney Blair Wycoff's point of view about suing
Nutella in her article?
O A) Nutella is not a nutritional substitute.
B) We want to hold foodmakers accountable.
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
O D) How could a mom mistake Nutella for health food?
Answer:
C) How could something that tastes so good be healthy?
Explanation:
Wyckoff´s remark about how something that tastes so good could be healthy is only a rhetorical question aimed to emphasize how ridiculous it was for her to believe that Nutella was a healthy snack, not her point of view on the topic.
She does claim that Nutella is not a nutritional substitute, and she does mention the objective of holding food makers accountable which can be understood as a kind of support for that idea. And she also questions Athena Hohenberg for mistaking Nutella for healthy food.
<span>My worst problem is the inability to speak clearly in public. <em>This </em>is not true when I am with my family.</span> The pronoun reference "this" in the sentence is used incorrectly because it used to refer to the whole sentence before it. It implies that the antecedent is "<span>My worst problem is the inability to speak clearly in public."</span> However, the readers don't know which part of that statement "is not true when I am with my family". Is the problem not true? Is the inability to speak clearly in public not true? The antecedent is vague, and we can say that (3) there's no specific antecedent.
Answer:
Explanation:
IMPORTANCE - (OWN PERSPECTIVE)
GARDENING
FISHING
JUNGLE
LET GO
It was beneficial because it brought many new foods and livestock to different parts of the world promoting more agriculture
It was detrimental because the Europeans killed over 90% of the Native American population