Answer:
45 degrees.
Step-by-step explanation:
All interior angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
We can form an equation: x+x+65+25=180
2x+90=180
2x=90
x=45.
By solving a system of equations, we will see that the width is 170ft and the length 275 ft.
<h3>
How to get the dimensions of the base?</h3>
For a rectangle of length x and width y, the perimeter is:
P = 2*(x + y).
Here we know that:
x = 2y - 65ft
p = 890ft = 2(x + y)
So we have a system of equations.
To solve this, we need to replace the first equation into the second one:
890ft = 2(x + y)
890ft = 2(( 2y - 65ft) + y)
Now we can solve this for y.
890ft = 4y - 130ft + 2y
890ft + 130ft = 6y
1020ft/6 = y = 170ft
So the width is 170ft, and we know that:
x = 2y - 65ft = 2*(170ft) - 65ft = 275ft
So the length is 275 ft.
If you want to learn more about systems of equations:
brainly.com/question/13729904
#SPJ1
The answer is Pier Pressure
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4a. ∠V≅∠Y
4b. TU ≅ WX
5. No; no applicable postulate
6. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>4.</h3>
a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...
∠V≅∠Y
__
b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...
TU ≅ WX
__
<h3>5.</h3>
The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)
"No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."
__
<h3>6.</h3>
The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.
1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given
2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent
3. . . . . ASA postulate
4. . . . . CPCTC
There's a 1 in 7 chance it will land on G.
