Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
The next thing the I can predict would happen is the Claude
would now realize that the Baptist are having both poor and smart leaders.
Based on the first study he conducted, Baptist are smarter than most people
therefore their leader should be smarter that the most leaders. And in the
second study, the he found out that Baptist leader are poor.
Is used to treat acne
reduces pain and fever
I believe that woman was Eleanor Roosevelt.
During the period when united Nations drafted the universal declaration of Human Right, eleanor Roosevelt held the position as <span> the </span>first<span> chair of the UN Commission on Human Rights. Not a single word in that draft could pass without Eleanor's approval.</span>
