The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not include the Synergy lessons and readings, we can say the following.
The situation was the prohibition of the local government to organize a fundraising rally in the public square of the town, arguing that our school has the proper facilities to organize it. However, the idea to make it public was to invite the members of our community to participate to get more money for the social cause we wanted to support.
We could have done in the school premises with our families, but that would have limited the scope of the event.
So through synergy, we talk to many non-governmental groups and social groups of our community, and we united forces to talk to officials and get the authorization.
Once we had the OK, we split responsibilities and allow each group to do what they needed to do based on its experience and people's skills.
So, trusting each other, sharing our resources, and leaving egos out of the question, we could unite and have a great event with the participation of the citizens in public property.
Answer: Happy and Mad
Explanation:
Some reacted happy because they desegregated schools, restaurants, etc. and some was mad because they wanted to keep segregation and keep "separate but equal" nut all 9 judges overturned that. That's when the Sibley Commission came
Hope this helps :)
It is c autocracy which is often governd by a top individual.
