A) people lost their jobs because of new technology. If anything people would gain jobs more than they would lose them because of a technology that technically talks to you. It just makes no sense to lose your job because of a radio.
Answer:
1.C-holding up some people as most worthy.
2.B-with the same respect they would show at an important ceremony.
3.c-direct, strict unwavering
Answer:
Practically the entirety of the cases that the Supreme Court hears are cases that are on allure. The Supreme Court has unique purview over a not many cases, however these are very uncommon. This implies that the Supreme Court is quite often hearing situations where just matters of law are at issue (instead of issues of certainty). The Supreme Court is essentially, in those cases, attempting to choose if the law (regardless of whether rule law or the Constitution) has been effectively applied.
Explanation:
Cases heard by the Supreme Court for the most part include significant and troublesome issues of law. Cases that are not significant, or where the law is self evident, don't make it as far as possible up the stepping stool to the Supreme Court.
Thus, the cases the Court hears are those that include significant and troublesome inquiries of law. It hears those cases either after they have come up through the government court framework or after they have been chosen by the high court of a state.
The second part exemplifies the idea that there are certain natural rights of all people that all people have by their birth and that these rights are self evident. According to them, a good government should protect those rights. This is followed by the grievances that are the third part.
