1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ipatiy [6.2K]
2 years ago
10

An interview with the French ambassador about diplomacy in France would be considered a ____________. a. primary source c. terti

ary source b. secondary source d. irrelevant source
History
1 answer:
Sloan [31]2 years ago
8 0

Option A. An interview with the French ambassador about diplomacy in France would be considered a a. primary source

<h3>What is a primary source?</h3>

This is the term that is used to refer to an information that is directly obtained.

The person providing the information is one that has a first hand knowledge and the information is not from other secondary sources.

Read more on primary source here:

brainly.com/question/896456

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
PLZ HELP
Pepsi [2]

I think the answer is b because most woman back then had no rights at all

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One reason the colonists had difficulty coming together to revolt against Britain
Sedbober [7]

Answer:Not All the colonists were disloyal to Britain

Explanation:Many colonists believed the U.S could not survive without Great Britain so they protested any revolution

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Spanish who lived and worked in missions often forced Native Americans to
Zepler [3.9K]
Serve them and work for them as well as to convert to Christianity .. <span />
5 0
3 years ago
In his inaugural address, president kennedy proves he is a forward thinker by focusing on what main idea?
garri49 [273]
Maybe it’s doing things for your country. I’m not sure. I just know the line “ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”
5 0
3 years ago
What is the constitutional basis for the implied powers of the federal government?
gayaneshka [121]

The correct answer is B) They are allowed by the necessary and proper clause of the Constitution.

Implied powers are ones that the federal government possess but they are not specifically written into the US Constitution. However, the necessary and proper clause allows for the federal government to take actions that are not necessarily written.

This is because the necessary and proper clause allows for the government to take these types of actions when it is necessary to fulfill the role/obligations of the US government.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How were slaves an important part of the success of Colonial America?
    11·2 answers
  • The piece of land that connects Egypt and what was once Mesopotamia was formerly known as
    8·1 answer
  • 2 reasons that the british solders might have believed they were justfied when they fired on the boston colonists
    6·2 answers
  • How old is china anne mclain?
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following effects was a direct result of the battle of Marathon?
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think Native Americans ate a lot of animal protein before Columbus came to America? Why?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the way people obtained goods change from the early 19th century to 20th century?
    9·1 answer
  • Give three functions of the Kabaka of Buganda Kingdom during the pre-colonial
    12·1 answer
  • Who was the first president of the Confederate States of America
    13·1 answer
  • How did Washington's Farewell Address influence political parties?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!