Answer:
reciprocal determinism
Explanation:
The term reciprocal determinism was given by one of the famous psychologist named Albert Bandura.
Reciprocal determinism: The term reciprocal determinism is defined as the process in which an individual is considered to be both influences and is influenced by the environment or social factors and personal factors. He believed that a person's behavior can be the result of getting conditioned through consequences.
According to Bandura, the reciprocal determinism theory consists of three major factors that are responsible for influencing a particular behavior i.e, the individual, the environment, and the behavior itself.
King Alaric led the Visigoths when they invaded Rome.
Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
King Alaric is a well-known figure in the Sack of Rome. He led the Visigoths and infiltrated Rome. He was elected the Chief of Visigoths and iterated that his people were not getting enough subsidies to live by.
After leading his people into several successful as well as unsuccessful heists, he finally sacked the western part of Rome. This event was marked as one of the most important events in history as it was the defeat of Western Rome after centuries.
<span>b. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee negotiates a treaty, and the House and the president must approve it.
</span><span>c. create a national public school system
</span>
<span>b. so the federal government does not interfere in health care
</span>
<span>c. states
</span><span>e. to ensure the integrity of the popular vote***</span>
Jaun's tendency can be called a: self-serving bias.
<h3>What is Self-serving Bias?</h3>
Self-serving bias can be described as the tendency of an individual to always take credit for positive events or outcomes that happens while they tend to blame external factors for the cause of failure or negative outcomes.
Therefore, Jaun's tendency can be called a: self-serving bias.
Learn more about self-serving bias on:
brainly.com/question/1325291
<span>Promise of a country's constitution is different from reality. The constitution often is molded by politically affluent people and thus the promise of a nation constitution may differ from reality. For eg if constitution allowed for right to speech, still people are not allowed to express their opinions freely.</span>
