Answer:
C. the FIFO method separates the work done during the current period to provide measurements of work done during the current period.
Explanation:
When you are calculating production costs and equivalent units, FIFO method only focuses on the goods produced during the accounting period and basically doesn't consider previous costs associated to beginning inventory. On the other hand, the weighted average method includes both current costs and costs associated to beginning WIP.
Helllllooooo!!!!! I am going to answer your question, my very best!! Don't expect me to be proffessor smart, i barely in grade 9! If i answer well, i want brainliest please! If i do not answer well, please comment!
Tariffs cost a lot of money to ship overseas the products people want. More demand is required as well as a variety of a lot of domestic products from multiple countries. Trade needs to be well within countries and ships need to be maintained. The trade balance may go wrong sometimes, such as a shipwreck. Then there will be a lot of international complications, not known to the public. Companies will pay more for the lost goods.
I wasn't sure if you wanted specifics, hope this works. HAVE A GREAT WEEK!
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the first choice. On the other hand, the answer for the second question is the second choice. I hope my answers has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
It's impossible to choose a correct option as you've not attached any of it. Anyway I think that you mean the term which is called <span>APPROVED BUDGET.</span>
Since Intel has a history of effectively transforming
R&D investment into income, the pro-forma version of the ration seems to be
of more significant. A company starting, for instance, would be unalike: its
track record would be much poorer and probabilities are that the criteria set
in place would not be as rough as Intel’s. Therefore, it appears that the significance
hinge on the kind of business: if future benefit is more of a doubt, then
R&D should be expensed. The contradictory is true if benefit is almost certain.
Intel also has the advantage of being very vibrant with its R&D objectives
and having exact, measurable standards. They note obviously what the funds are apportioned
to and what the end outcomes should be of the growth.