The answer is <u>“Great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State legislatures”.</u>
Federalist No. 10 is an essay composed by James Madison as the tenth of The Federalist Papers: a progression of papers started by Alexander Hamilton contending for the endorsement of the United States Constitution. Distributed on November 23, 1787 under the pen name", "Federalist No. 10 is among the most exceptionally respected of all American political compositions.
Madison saw the Constitution as framing a "happy combination" of a republic and a majority rules system and with the considerable and total interests being alluded to the national, the neighborhood and specific to the State lawmaking bodies the power would not be brought together, therefore making it more troublesome for unworthy contender to rehearse the horrible expressions by which races are over and over again conveyed.
Answer:
Correct answer is В. God has already decided which people will get into heaven.
Explanation:
Only option B is correct answer as Calvin believed that God already determined who will be saved and go to heaven and who will not.
We cannot basically run away from our destiny. We are no sinful because we want to be, but because we were made like that.
Therefore, all other options are not correct. Most of the people will not go to heaven and no matter what we do our destiny is already decided.
A large number of people move up the social class ladder, a large number move down, and the social class system shows little change in exchange mobility.
Social mobility is the movement of a person's social position from one to another. The shift could be greater, lower, intergenerational, or intragenerational, and it's not always possible to tell whether it's for the better or worse.
Exchange mobility shows that society is divided into classes, and that these classes keep their population levels largely constant. If a certain number of people shift from the middle class to the upper class, an equal number is anticipated to go in the opposite direction.
To learn more about mobility here: brainly.com/question/359904
#SPJ4
<h3><u>
Full question:</u></h3>
Why is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model but NOT in the classical model?
A) The Keynesian model assumes that the level of real GDP is inflexible.
B) The Keynesian model assumes that people work for motives other than those of earning an income for themselves and supporting a family.
C) The Keynesian model assumes that workers can lose their jobs to foreign competition during economic downturns.
D) The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward.
<h3><u>
Answer:</u></h3>
The Keynesian model assumes that nominal wages are inflexible downward - is persistent unemployment a possibility in the Keynesian model
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
The classical model is quite the usual microeconomic principles. Keynes claimed that the classical model is not common. In the classical model, the basis for the rationalizing is notional demand and supply, which implies market equilibrium. Keynes proposed the idea of aggregate demand, the overall demand for products and services in the economy.
Keynes supposed that the unemployment force persists regularly. Keynes was suspicious that the economic dominance of demand and supply drive the economy to a common equilibrium. Rising government spending or cutting taxes will boost aggregate demand.
<u />
Answer:
regulate their emotion.
Explanation:
Cognitive abilities are the abilities of gaining knowledge and the abilities at which one comprehends, it also includes the ways we reason, problems Solving abilities, how well one can memorize and so on. Cognitive abilities are measured by what is called Intelligence Quotient(IQ). As one gets older, we tends to focus more on emotional well-being.
In 2011, Amy Winecoff and his colleagues; Kevin S. LaBar and Scott A. Huettel indicates that as cognitive abilities decline, people may be less able to REGULATE THEIR EMOTIONS.