1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
2 years ago
7

The Dred Scott decision challenged the very heart of the Republican Party platform. What events occurred as a result of the Dred

Scott decision
History
1 answer:
kobusy [5.1K]2 years ago
4 0

Following events occurred from as a result of the Dredd Scott decision

  • Slavery,
  • Dredd Scott was bought by a new master and immediately freed along with his family.

Dredd Scott v. Sandford,[a] 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court during which the Court held that the us Constitution wasn't meant to include American citizenship for people of African descent, regardless of whether or not they were enslaved or free, so the rights and privileges that the Constitution confers upon Americans couldn't apply to them. The Supreme Court's decision has been widely denounced, both for the way overtly racist the selection was and its crucial role within the beginning of the American war four years later. Legal scholar Bernard Schwartz stated that "stands on top in any list of the worst Supreme Court decisions". Judge Charles Evans Hughes called it the Court's "greatest self-inflicted wound". Historian Junius P. Rodriguez stated that "universally condemned because the U.S. Supreme Court's worst decision ever." Historian David Thomas Konig mentioned it as "unquestionably, our court's worst decision ever." this choice was made on the case Dredd Scott, an enslaved blackamoor whose owners had taken him from Missouri, a slave-holding state, into Illinois and also the Wisconsin Territory, where slavery was illegal. When one among his owners later brought him back to the Missouri, Scott sued in court for his freedom and legal claimed it because he had been taken into "free" U.S. territory, he had automatically been freed and was legally not a slave. Scott also sued them first in Missouri state court, which ruled that he was still a slave under its law. He then sued in U.S. tribunal, which ruled against him by mentioning that it had to use Missouri law to the case. He then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

This marked as one of the Historical cases ever made and memorable for Africans.

Learn more about, Dredd Scott case and its decision

brainly.com/question/315266

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Was there anyway that america was able to understand fundamentalism at the time in 1930?
Nezavi [6.7K]
No America totally understood the whole concept of fundamentalism
7 0
3 years ago
From what country did most<br> immigrants arrive on the West<br> Coast during the 1800's?
Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

Ireland

Explanation:

most imagination in the 1800 came from Eastern Europe

6 0
3 years ago
A supporter of the Progressive movement would most support which of the
AleksandrR [38]

The supporter of the Progressive would most support the government policy that is forcing business owners to make workplaces safer. Thus option (A) is correct.

<h3>What is Progressive Movement?</h3>

Progressive Movement is also termed as Progressive Era which the time frame between 1890 to 1920 where many social and political reform took place.

It was aimed for the betterment of the society. It was basically meant to counter the effects of the industrialization and to eliminate the unfair practices in the business.

The government policy requiring business owners to make workplaces safer would receive the strongest support from a Progressive Era. As a result, choice (A) is right.

Learn more about Progressive Movement here:

brainly.com/question/11704287

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
HELP!!!!! MEEEEE PLSSSSSS <br> Pls help me with this!
LenKa [72]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Only statement that is subjective and is, therefore, an opinion

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did one party rule help destroy Africa?
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

One-party rule help destroys Africa by being a less competitive political structure, or without the true principle of democracy; this caused an increase in greed, corruption, inexperience, and leaders full of power who couldn't govern the nations well. Some of which were the likes of Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, Muammar Gaddafi of Libya, etc.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • During the era of reform studied, which was the last group to win the rights they fought for?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following did NOT influence Truman's decision to drop the
    14·2 answers
  • What did the 10th century Magyars called themselves people of the ?
    14·1 answer
  • What parts of the ottoman empire fell under european rule between the 1880s and 1914?
    13·1 answer
  • Analysis: Based on this speech, does the author believe the Federal government is responsible for providing relief to Americans
    14·1 answer
  • What new information do you learn from Robert Kennedy?
    6·1 answer
  • What was meant by the Enlightenment idea of natural rights?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the outcome of the demonstrations in Birmingham?
    14·1 answer
  • Dissolution of Old Empires
    7·1 answer
  • If you lived during the Japanese occupation<br> will you also collaborate on their programs? Why?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!