The analytical approach is preferable because the primary issue with Euclidean geometry is that it is not enough to support all of the theorems that he claims to establish.
<h3>What is geometry?</h3>
It is defined as the branch of mathematics that is concerned with the size, shape, and orientation of two-dimensional figures.
As we have given about the Euclidean and analytical geometry.
Without using any numerical measurements, we have investigated the connections between points, lines, and planes in Euclidean geometry.
In analytical geometry, we've looked at how the locations of points in a Cartesian coordinate system related to algebra and geometry.
The analytical approach is preferable because the primary issue with Euclidean geometry is that it is not enough to support all of the theorems that he claims to establish.
If the Euclidean geometry can be more advantageous in particular circumstances
Example: If using terrain or building chart),
Thus, the analytical approach is preferable because the primary issue with Euclidean geometry is that it is not enough to support all of the theorems that he claims to establish.
Learn more about the geometry here:
brainly.com/question/16836548
#SPJ1
