1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darya [45]
2 years ago
5

A historical source can be deemed unreliable if the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint. In this cas

e, the source is
.
History
1 answer:
AleksandrR [38]2 years ago
3 0

A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.

<h3>What is bias?</h3>

Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.

Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.

Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.

Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Where did Columbus establish a permanent colony?
Pepsi [2]
It is <span>D.
the West Indies</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What was the role of a proconsul under Augustus? Do we have these in America?
shusha [124]

Answer:

The role of a proconsul under Augustus was acted governor over the province. The White House staff is reported to have concluded after an internal review that the United States does not have a parliamentary system. The lesson deduced from this insight is evidently that we have proconsuls instead, but in neither case is a regime of separated powers treated as more than an inconvenience. Hope this helped.

3 0
3 years ago
The Twelve Tables were a written set of laws
lbvjy [14]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

because its harsh

5 0
3 years ago
I need help anyone know?? Please answer only if you know
jekas [21]

Answer:

American

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Between 1801 and 1851, Manchester's population increased by about. In the 1800s, Manchester's population increased because peopl
ludmilkaskok [199]

Manchester's population between 1801 and 1851 increased from 89,000 people to 400,000 people, which is a bit more than 4 and half times increase in population in this short time-frame.

The population of this once small town of only 10,000 people, rapidly increased after the industrialization, and people moving in large masses form the rural to the urban ares.

With this quick and big increase in population, Manchester became the third biggest city in Britain, with only London and Glasgow being bigger in size and population.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which forensic scientist helped solve the St. Valentine’s Day Massacre?
    14·2 answers
  • What group of people did not come from Spain to settle in Latin America?
    12·2 answers
  • What continents were involved in the mediterranean trade route?
    12·1 answer
  • Based on the historical context information how does elizabeth cady stanton use the popular view fo women to argue for womens ri
    12·2 answers
  • In a command economy, decisions about which goods are produced bare
    6·1 answer
  • What is one election reform that the Progressive movement instigated?
    8·2 answers
  • Drawing congressional district boundaries to the advantage of the party in power in the legislature is called which of the follo
    7·1 answer
  • Why were Frances North American holdings so sparsely populated
    8·2 answers
  • The British attacked Washington D.C. for all of the following reasons, except ______________________ . a. to get revenge on the
    5·2 answers
  • Europeans began to explore and expand in the 1500s because they wanted to:.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!