Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
1. Embargo - An official ban or trade or other commercial activity with a particular country.
2. Tariff - Tax on imports.
3. Economic growth - The ability of the economy to increase the production of goods and services.
4. Specialization - Workers concentrate on producing those goods and services for which they have a competitive advantage.
5. Currency exchange rate - The price of one country's currency expressed in terms of another country's currency.
6. Quota - Limitation on imports.
7. Voluntary free trade - An ideal feature of a global economy; it is when each party involved in a trade expects to gain from the trade.
8. Trade barriers - Restrictions placed on trade, for example tariffs and quotas.
<span>Structural Assimilation, aka? integration; members of a subordinate racial or ethnic group gain acceptance in everyday social interaction with members of the dominant group. Biological assimilation, aka? amalgamation; members of one group marry those of other social or ethnic groups. Psychologicalassimilation.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
d. There are allocation trade-offs between fecundity and other traits.
Explanation:
for lower-than-expected fecundity , despite increased fitness is plausible because there are allocation fecundity and other traits.
Fecundity is nothing but the ability of an organism to produce and abundance of off-spring. It is same as fertility. Fecundity also depends upon size of the organism. This is called allocation fecundity.
Hence, option d is correct.
<span>Because they already became a tributary state to China, they were invaded by Japan and eventually were conquered by the Manchus. They felt like "a shrimp among two whales", or in other words, inferior to the Japanese and Chinese, so they started their own country and excluded all foreigners except very few selected Japanese and Chinese.</span>
