1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wel
3 years ago
8

Explain what types of beliefs Charlemagne may have had? Why are they important for a ruler?

History
1 answer:
dezoksy [38]3 years ago
5 0

After the fall of the Roman Empire, Charlemagne became king of the Frankish people in the year 751. He had the main belief of unifying all Germanic peoples and convert them to Christianity. Other important beliefs he had were the revival of culture and education which had been relegated during the dark ages. Thanks to these beliefs, Charlemagne got to control a large part of Europe. They are important for a ruler since promoting education within it citizens helps the development of a society. The firm belief he had in uniting all peoples is represented in many rulers that followed him like Napoleon; it is an important principle to consolidate a government and peace in a territory. Another example that he set for future leaders is the ability to make strategic alliances, the one he made with the Catholic Church eventually turn him into the holy roman emperor.

You might be interested in
What has been true in the United States since the 1960s?
Semenov [28]
Minorities have become quicker than the white population.
This has been true in the United States since the 1960s.
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
French Indian war cause effect/outcome
alexdok [17]
Effect: As a result of the British victory in the French and Indian War, France was effectively expelled from the New World. ... Because England had incurred significant debt while fighting the war in and for the colonies, Parliament attempted to recoup the financial loss by issuing the 1765 Stamp Act on the colonists.
8 0
2 years ago
Question 1
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

The British Agricultural Revolution, or Second Agricultural Revolution, was the unprecedented increase in agricultural production in Britain due to increases in labour and land productivity between the mid-17th and late 19th centuries. Agricultural output grew faster than the population over the century to 1770, and thereafter productivity remained among the highest in the world. This increase in the food supply contributed to the rapid growth of population in England and Wales, from 5.5 million in 1700 to over 9 million by 1801, though domestic production gave way increasingly to food imports in the nineteenth century as the population more than tripled to over 35 million.[1] The rise in productivity accelerated the decline of the agricultural share of the labour force, adding to the urban workforce on which industrialization depended: the Agricultural Revolution has therefore been cited as a cause of the Industrial Revolution.

However, historians continue to dispute when exactly such a "revolution" took place and of what it consisted. Rather than a single event, G. E. Mingay states that there were a "profusion of agricultural revolutions, one for two centuries before 1650, another emphasising the century after 1650, a third for the period 1750–1780, and a fourth for the middle decades of the nineteenth century".[2] This has led more recent historians to argue that any general statements about "the Agricultural Revolution" are difficult to sustain.[3][4]

One important change in farming methods was the move in crop rotation to turnips and clover in place of fallow. Turnips can be grown in winter and are deep-rooted, allowing them to gather minerals unavailable to shallow-rooted crops. Clover fixes nitrogen from the atmosphere into a form of fertiliser. This permitted the intensive arable cultivation of light soils on enclosed farms and provided fodder to support increased livestock numbers whose manure added further to soil fertility.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Did karna did the right by giving awayhis thing to others
JulsSmile [24]

yes karna did right by giving his things to others because they need help and I think karna has helped them..

7 0
2 years ago
Why killed Shaka Zulu?
babymother [125]

Answer:

Shaka, founder of the Zulu Kingdom of southern Africa, is murdered by his two half-brothers, Dingane and Mhlangana, after Shaka's mental illness threatened to destroy the Zulu tribe. ... In his grief, Shaka had hundreds of Zulus killed, and he outlawed the planting of crops and the use of milk for a year.

Sibling: Dingane kaSenzangakhona, Mhlanga...

Explanation:

its correct.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • This chart represents the four "MAIN" causes of World War I. Which two causes BEST relate to the industrialization of Europe in
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you think the contents of the packet were so important?<br><br><br> *number the stars*
    14·1 answer
  • Who and where rode through town saying "the British are coming, the British are coming!"?
    14·2 answers
  • Northern Democrats were nicknamed “scalawags” right?
    15·1 answer
  • They are seldom unjust, and have a greater abhorrence of injustice than any other people. Their sultan shows no mercy to anyone
    6·2 answers
  • Which Enlightenment thinker believed that it is a government's job to protect the natural rights of life, liberty, and property?
    15·2 answers
  • HOW IS THE WORLD OF RADIO ANNOUNCING DIFFERENT TODAY THEN WHEN IT<br> STARTED?
    14·1 answer
  • What dose bhaki mean
    6·1 answer
  • A. What disadvantages did the Allies face?
    7·1 answer
  • The United States, Great Britain and ten other countries came together after WOrld war 2 to form the North Atlantic Treaty Organ
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!