During the first great war(WWI) countries had formed defensive alliances with one another. So if 5 countries were in an alliance together, and 1 country was offended by someone, instead of 2 countries going to war, all 5 countries plus who ever started the conflict would all go to war. In case of WWI, instead of 2 countries going to war after archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated, countries from Europe and Asia went to war.
Let us see all the arguments one by one.
1) It is true that nuclear energy involves no greenhouse gas emissions. In the current state of the environment and world politics (recent Paris agreement on carbon emissions) it is a very important asset. Nuclear energy is much more mass efficient too and the waste after its use will be much smaller in scale than greenhouse emissions. This is the correct answer.
2) It is not easily accessible, at least in its current state. It demands great technological advancements and even greater awareness of technology when one tries to avoid accidents. Only a handful of countries have the infrastructure to have nuclear plants and for the rest of the world it is only a remote reality.
3) The prices are not controlled by an international commission; even if it were so, it is not that big of an advantage, since other traditional means of energy could enter this state of being controlled too.
4) Sadly, the health risks associated with nuclear energy are huge. Radioactivity is very hard to contain or to dispose of it once it is in the wild and the consequences are harsh for the organisms; it affects our DNA and it leads to mutations and increased cancer rates.
Answer:The states had the power to enforce the national laws. ... The national government had no national military.
Explanation:Thats basically the explanation so...
esto no es realmente una pregunta, más bien un hecho
The line that describes the purpose of this excerpt of the prologue is:
It states the conflict that occurs at the end of the play.
Explanation:
The play is about the war that Henry the 6th has to fight to keep his kingdom and his reckless campaigns in the French territories he believed he had natural claim on like previous kings.
This play was in a way symbolic of the waning influence of the dynasty that Henry VI was from and the war would prove to be the nail in the coffin.
This prologue sets up the major pieces of the conflict very well here only by setting up the war and the eventual losses of the person faced.
