How much power should the president have? On one hand, a powerful executive permits quick and decisive action, which is important for responding to current events. On the other hand, if the president gets too powerful, Congress and the people may lack the ability to hold him or her accountable.
“The Executive Department Further Considered,” written by Alexander Hamilton. In this essay, Hamilton argues that a single executive (led by one person as president, rather than several people acting as a council) is the best form for the executive branch of the United States.
He reasons that one president can act more quickly, and with more secrecy when necessary, than a larger group of leaders. He also argues that a single executive is less dangerous to democracy than a council, because it is easier to identify and remove one corrupt person than to discover who among several leaders is a bad actor.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
The last one!!! Im sure!!! Theyre terrorists basically
The living conditions were awful, and the employer can make you work for fewer wages. The employer can as well make you work more hours.Women and children were working. Just because the factories were booming doesn't mean the living conditions were right.Everyone was living close together and more diseases developed.
Answer:
Bad guys isn't the best way to describe the losers of World War 1. However, the standard answer, the one you'd see Hollywood point to, are the Central Powers: . German Empire
, Austria-Hungary
, Ottoman Empire
Explanation:
In 1914, Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb nationalist, assassinated Austro-Hungarian heir Archduke Franz Ferdinand. This was the culmination of a simmering regional conflict that ingnighted WW1.
