Yes
if you need to know how it goes ill tell you
This should be false because the data is not organized year by year, but rather in an alphabetic order. Of course, it's also false because not all encyclopedias contain statistical data, it all depends on the encyclopedia.
Answer:
What happened in 2016 that now seems to have important ramifications for the replacement of Justice Ginsburg is that "Justice Ginsburg criticized Donald Trump in several interviews. She went ahead to call Trump a "faker". She said "He is a faker,"..."He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego..." Her statements were known to be against the codes of Supreme Court.
Explanation:
In 2016, Ginsburg blasted Trump. She was not in support of Trump's presidential pursuit. She kept opposing and speaking against Trump.
As a Justice of the Supreme Court, she was not meant to publicly show her support for or resentment against any candidate. But she was seen to have gone too far. So, such action made it an important ramification for her replacement.
<span>
C. By adding a disclaimer at the beginning of the show</span>
Because the topic of alien invasion was a hot topic around
the time _War of the Worlds_ came out, it was very possible and very plausible that
those listening to the radio program would, in fact, believe what they were
listening to were real-life events and not a science-fiction piece. As such, at the beginning of the radio
program, there was a disclaimer that preceded the show that informed listeners
that what they were about to hear was not real.
However, those who happened to tune in late and happened to miss the
disclaimer, and many believed that what they were listening to was actually
happening.
