1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin [286]
3 years ago
15

If each state in the US were to separate from the Union, what consequences might take place? Based on what you've learned in thi

s lesson, write a short paragraph identifying two consequences that may occur.
History
1 answer:
mote1985 [20]3 years ago
8 0
Here are some possible results of states separating from the union:

1) Federal government has less power- If states decided to officially leave the US, they would no longer be under the rules/laws of the United States. Since this is the case, the federal government would have less control over the actions of these various states.

2) Creation of a new country- Just like during the Civil War, if states seceded they could form their own government/country with completely new laws.
You might be interested in
W.E.B. DuBois was a vocal advocate of Marcus Garvey. Truth or False​
kvv77 [185]

Answer: False​

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Who was an advocate of nonviolent resistance in the 1960s?
Snowcat [4.5K]
The Salt March on March 12, 1930
A demonstrator offers a flower to military police at a National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam-sponsored protest in Arlington, Virginia, on October 21, 1967
A "No NATO" protester in Chicago, 2012Nonviolent resistance (NVR or nonviolent action) is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests, civil disobedience, economic or political noncooperation, satyagraha, or other methods, while being nonviolent. This type of action highlights the desires of an individual or group that feels that something needs to change to improve the current condition of the resisting person or group. It is largely but wrongly taken as synonymous with civil resistance. Each of these terms—nonviolent resistance and civil resistance—has its distinct merits and also quite different connotations and commitments.
Major nonviolent resistance advocates include Mahatma Gandhi, Henry David Thoreau, Te Whiti o Rongomai, Tohu Kākahi, Leo Tolstoy, Alice Paul, Martin Luther King, Jr, James Bevel, Václav Havel, Andrei Sakharov, Lech Wałęsa, Gene Sharp, and many others. There are hundreds of books and papers on the subject—see Further reading below.
From 1966 to 1999, nonviolent civic resistance played a critical role in fifty of sixty-seven transitions from authoritarianism.[1] Recently, nonviolent resistance has led to the Rose Revolution in Georgia and the Orange Revolution in Ukraine. Current nonviolent resistance includes the Jeans Revolution in Belarus, the "Jasmine" Revolution in Tunisia, and the fight of the Cuban dissidents. Many movements which promote philosophies of nonviolence or pacifism have pragmatically adopted the methods of nonviolent action as an effective way to achieve social or political goals. They employ nonviolent resistance tactics such as: information warfare, picketing, marches, vigils, leafletting, samizdat, magnitizdat, satyagraha, protest art, protest music and poetry, community education and consciousness raising, lobbying, tax resistance, civil disobedience, boycotts or sanctions, legal/diplomatic wrestling, underground railroads, principled refusal of awards/honors, and general strikes. Nonviolent action differs from pacifism by potentially being proactive and interventionist.
A great deal of work has addressed the factors that lead to violent mobilization, but less attention has been paid to understanding why disputes become violent or nonviolent, comparing these two as strategic choices relative to conventional politics.[2]
Contents 1 History of nonviolent resistance2 See also2.1 Documentaries2.2 Organizations and people
7 0
3 years ago
The requirements for a master’s degree in psychology generally include __________.
liberstina [14]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I'm pretty sure its correct it might be D.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the stability of china's government
Rudik [331]
At the moment chinas government stability is at risk
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement correctly describes how Eleanor Roosevelt handled the position of First Lady? A. She stayed in the White House t
Anastaziya [24]
The best answer from the list would be "<span> B. She travelled the country visiting people affected by the Great Depression" but she of course did many other things as well. </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why is the war of 1812 called the second war for american independence?
    12·1 answer
  • Three affects of the spanish american war on america
    10·2 answers
  • What was the result of Republican anger st president Johnson over reconstruction
    8·2 answers
  • Who did not have citizenship in the Roman Republic?
    5·1 answer
  • What state was Richard Henry Lee, who
    11·2 answers
  • What did the independence of South Africa from Great Britain cause to happen?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a true statement about the Harlem Renaissance?
    13·2 answers
  • A formal amendment
    11·1 answer
  • What percentage of the world is luthern
    6·1 answer
  • How was Hitler's belief in a superior Aryan race related to his desire for the
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!