Answer:
301 is correct answer. Please Mark it as brainlist answer.
Answer: 2/3 * (× + 2 )
Step-by-step explanation:
((x²-4)/(3x)) ÷ ((x-2)/(2x)). ⇒ [ ( ײ - 4 ) * 2x ] ÷ [ ( × - 2 ) *3x ]
Simplifying by x [ 2 * ( ײ - 4 ) ] ÷ [ ( × - 2 ) *3 ] ⇒ (2/3)*{ [ ( x-2 )*(×+2)]÷ (×-2) }
Simplifying by ( ×+2) 2/3 * (× + 2 )
The answer is 2 first you add then multiple
Answer:
21. B. Graph Z
23. A. neither function nor relation
24. D. relation only
Step-by-step explanation:
21. Graph Z is the only graph which does not pass the vertical line test
23. The graph does not pass the vertical line test, AND it is not merely given x and y points like a relation. It is graphed as a squiggly line with no given x and y points, therefore you could not make a relation from it either.
24. There is an x value of -4 twice, meaning the set does not pass the vertical line test, HOWEVER, it is a given collection of x and y values, making it a relation.
I would appreciate brainliest, have an amazing day
The formula for the perimeter of a rectangle is P = 2L + 2W, where L is the length and W is the width. Because we don't know either the length or the width we can't solve the problem...too many unknowns. BUT we do have some information that will help with this problem. We are told that the length is 2 feet longer than the width, so we can use that: L = W+2. Now we can make the substitution into the formula along with the value for the perimeter that was given to us: 36=2(W+2) + 2W, and 36 = 2W + 4 + 2W; 36 = 4W + 4; 32 = 4W and W = 8. Now go back to where you said that the length is 2 feet longer than the width. If the width is 8, then 8+2 = 10 for the length.
