1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Troyanec [42]
2 years ago
7

Economic Survey

Law
1 answer:
ad-work [718]2 years ago
6 0

The text deals with how India's taxation system should be revised and reformed, to ensure that the most appropriate citizens pay the most necessary taxes that will promote India's infrastructural growth.

Based on this, we can answer the other questions as follows:

  1. The research is against the increase in income tax exemption limits because it believes that this increases the number of taxpayers as it promotes the economic rise of citizens.
  2. The text states that the property tax should have its limits extended because it refers to objects that are easy to identify.

<h3>How does research establish this?</h3>

According to the research, current income tax limits allow rich people to pay higher amounts, while poor people are exempt. This allows poor people to optimize the money they have more efficiently, promoting economic growth and becoming income taxpayers in the future. For this reason, income tax limits should not be increased.

However, the research states that property tax limits should be increased, as this type of property is an immovable object, easy to identify, and belongs to people with high social classes. It is possible to tax them fairly, without compromising their economic condition.

Learn more about property tax:

brainly.com/question/15227817

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
6. How was the decision in Stanford v. Kentucky changed? Be sure to provide the name and a brief description of the congressiona
MArishka [77]

Stanford v. Kentucky, was a United States Supreme Court case in the year 1989 that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime.

The Supreme Court in the year 2005,while handling the Roper v. Simmons' case ruled that the death penalty is a disproportionate punishment for juveniles, and thus it violates the Eighth Amendment to impose a death sentence on a youthful murderer who committed the crime before age 18.

Christopher Simmons, who was 17 at the time, committed a crime that led to a death sentence.

The Court said that the society views juveniles as categorically less culpable than the average criminal. The supreme court argued than a man only becomes culpable of any criminal act when he reaches the age of 18, and claimed at imposing a death penalty on a young child who is not old enough to take charge of his own actions is wrong.

The supreme court claimed that a juvenile who committed a heinous crime can be made to forfeit his fundamental rights rather than being murdered.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Res ipsa loquitur shifts the burden of proof from the plaintiff to the defendant. True or False
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

TRUE!!!!!!!!!

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Whats your opinion on the year we've had so far?
Talja [164]

Answer:

Bad but I can see it turn it a little good

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is it true that the U.S. needs to eliminate its national debt?
wel

Answer:

It is true

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. Do you think imprisonment is the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated a law? Why or why not
marishachu [46]

Answer:

Imprisonment is not the only way to rehabilitate a person who violated the law, since there are alternative penalties to prison, such as fines, bonds, jobs and collaborations in non-profit social entities and victim reparation systems. In all these cases, the defendant receives a penalty, but this is not the prison but an alternative to it, which still puts him at a disadvantage compared to the rest of society as a result of his non-compliance of the law, but due to the low severity of the crime, the defendant does not deserve a prison sentence.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does the bill of rights protect individuals civil liberties
    13·1 answer
  • In the early history of law enforcement
    8·1 answer
  • Mike worked for Frank's Pizza as a driver and was an agent. His duties consisted of making deliveries along a designated route.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following are more likely to happen if you have bad credit? Check all that apply.
    9·2 answers
  • If a man sues his neighbor for a violation of the rights of personal property, what type of law is he employing? O A. Criminal l
    8·1 answer
  • If a truck is ahead in the left lane with a right turn signal on, stay away from its ___________ side.
    7·2 answers
  • 5.
    14·1 answer
  • A plaintiff has brought an action for personal injuries against a store, in connection with an incident in which he slipped and
    10·1 answer
  • If you apply the legal rules and decide that peter cannot use the excuse of no knowledge to avoid repaying the loan of RM 10000
    13·1 answer
  • The first major piece of antitrust legislation was the
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!