1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
3 years ago
13

6. How was the decision in Stanford v. Kentucky changed? Be sure to provide the name and a brief description of the congressiona

l act, constitutional amendment, or subsequent Supreme Court ruling that overturned it. (2 points)
Law
2 answers:
MArishka [77]3 years ago
5 0

Stanford v. Kentucky, was a United States Supreme Court case in the year 1989 that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime.

The Supreme Court in the year 2005,while handling the Roper v. Simmons' case ruled that the death penalty is a disproportionate punishment for juveniles, and thus it violates the Eighth Amendment to impose a death sentence on a youthful murderer who committed the crime before age 18.

Christopher Simmons, who was 17 at the time, committed a crime that led to a death sentence.

The Court said that the society views juveniles as categorically less culpable than the average criminal. The supreme court argued than a man only becomes culpable of any criminal act when he reaches the age of 18, and claimed at imposing a death penalty on a young child who is not old enough to take charge of his own actions is wrong.

The supreme court claimed that a juvenile who committed a heinous crime can be made to forfeit his fundamental rights rather than being murdered.

Anastasy [175]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It was changed in Ropers v Simmons

Explanation:

• Stanford v Kentucky was a United States Supreme court case that authorized the imposition of death penalties to people who are 16 years and above at the time the crime was committed.

• Ropers v Simmons was a case in the U.S Supreme court which states that it was unconstitutional to enforce capital punishment for crimes committed while under 18 years. Christopher Simmons and his two friends murdered Shirley Cook and he confessed to committing the crime. The case was brought for trial and the appeal challenged the constitutionality of capital punishment for juveniles.

• The 5-4 decision in Ropers v Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford v Kentucky where offenders from 16 years were punished for crimes committed.

You might be interested in
Which of the options are identification procedures which occur before a trial?
Y_Kistochka [10]
All of them would be correct
5 0
3 years ago
When might anarchy be effective
mylen [45]

Answer:

Anarchism is a belief that society should have no government, laws, police, or any other authority. Having that belief is perfectly legal, and the majority of anarchists in the U.S. advocate change through non-violent, non-criminal means.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What generalization can you make about these five presidential elections?
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

The only safe generalization one can make on the subject is that it is common for today's candidates to ach was a fairly close election between the top two candidate

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a benefit of restoration justice, which the judge might have felt was valuable in Justin case?
Elis [28]

Answer:

In simple words, Restorative justice refers to the  legal strategy where one of the approaches to a case is to arrange a meeting between both the perpetrator including the complainant, often with members of the broader community.

Academic evaluation of restorative justice seems to be optimistic. Most findings indicate that it makes criminals less inclined to commit an offence. The 2007 research also indicates that it would have the greatest level of similar values and responsibility for any sort of justice.

6 0
3 years ago
What is a change you would like to see made in congress?
boyakko [2]

Answer:

I think we must start with the view that perhaps there are some things we will agree on to form progress for the country.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Roles john locke in devepment constitutional law
    13·2 answers
  • Someone who is agile is all of these, except:
    8·2 answers
  • Imagine you are president right now. What kinds of things would you do for the country?
    6·2 answers
  • Consumer protection laws, which commonly regulate the form of consumer contracts, provide that back-page disclaimers are void if
    12·1 answer
  • When discussing government and society, the term power can be best defined as...
    7·1 answer
  • Why do banks practice fractional reserve banking?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a military infraction
    12·1 answer
  • List all of the areas in which Article 1 section 8 of the US Constitution provides for federal employment and the spending of fe
    5·2 answers
  • What is a designated driver?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT one of the criteria that makes a science scientific?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!