1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
3 years ago
13

6. How was the decision in Stanford v. Kentucky changed? Be sure to provide the name and a brief description of the congressiona

l act, constitutional amendment, or subsequent Supreme Court ruling that overturned it. (2 points)
Law
2 answers:
MArishka [77]3 years ago
5 0

Stanford v. Kentucky, was a United States Supreme Court case in the year 1989 that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime.

The Supreme Court in the year 2005,while handling the Roper v. Simmons' case ruled that the death penalty is a disproportionate punishment for juveniles, and thus it violates the Eighth Amendment to impose a death sentence on a youthful murderer who committed the crime before age 18.

Christopher Simmons, who was 17 at the time, committed a crime that led to a death sentence.

The Court said that the society views juveniles as categorically less culpable than the average criminal. The supreme court argued than a man only becomes culpable of any criminal act when he reaches the age of 18, and claimed at imposing a death penalty on a young child who is not old enough to take charge of his own actions is wrong.

The supreme court claimed that a juvenile who committed a heinous crime can be made to forfeit his fundamental rights rather than being murdered.

Anastasy [175]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It was changed in Ropers v Simmons

Explanation:

• Stanford v Kentucky was a United States Supreme court case that authorized the imposition of death penalties to people who are 16 years and above at the time the crime was committed.

• Ropers v Simmons was a case in the U.S Supreme court which states that it was unconstitutional to enforce capital punishment for crimes committed while under 18 years. Christopher Simmons and his two friends murdered Shirley Cook and he confessed to committing the crime. The case was brought for trial and the appeal challenged the constitutionality of capital punishment for juveniles.

• The 5-4 decision in Ropers v Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford v Kentucky where offenders from 16 years were punished for crimes committed.

You might be interested in
***50 POINTS+BRAINLIEST*** Number 8 <br> Question in picture below.
Licemer1 [7]

Answer:

BOTH

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is one of the major arguments against term limits for state legislators?
Olin [163]
Need more information to answer this particular question.
4 0
3 years ago
Is the company LegalShield available in all of the USA including Alaska?
Temka [501]
I believe so if I remember correctly
4 0
3 years ago
Tatiana is looking to purchase a BMW that costs $30,000. She will make a $6,000  down payment and borrow the remaining with a 60
AnnyKZ [126]

Answer:

$30,000 - $6,000 = $24,000

$24,000 to finance at 4.71% for 60 months

24,000 divided by 60 = $400/month + 4.71% ( $18.84) = $418.84/month.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Nell, a member of a protected class, applies for a job with Origami Paper Corporation, but fails the company’s employment test a
Greeley [361]

Answer:

b. disparate- impact discrimination

Explanation:

Disparate impact discrimination is a term used to refer to a situation where a member of a protected class felt harmed in a situation where he or she suffered unintentional discrimination. That is, this member suffered a type of discrimination that seemed harmless or neutral, but which harmed that member or harmed the group to which he belongs.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The
    9·1 answer
  • What is an example of globalization?​
    11·2 answers
  • How has the court generally ruled when applying the 8th Amendment to the death penalty?​
    14·1 answer
  • Por que los derechos humanos son imprescriptibles​
    9·1 answer
  • MitoSearch is a software package used by crime labs to compile and analyze
    12·1 answer
  • When can omission satisfy the actual of accomplice liability
    14·1 answer
  • Jessa is a medical research assistant. She is examining antibodies under a microscope. She has to categorize each type of antibo
    14·1 answer
  • True or False.<br><br> A session law is passed by Congress and published in the <br> U.S. Code.
    11·1 answer
  • Ha hatdog djiuef ok.
    8·2 answers
  • (Citizenship 02.05 HC)
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!