1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
4 years ago
13

6. How was the decision in Stanford v. Kentucky changed? Be sure to provide the name and a brief description of the congressiona

l act, constitutional amendment, or subsequent Supreme Court ruling that overturned it. (2 points)
Law
2 answers:
MArishka [77]4 years ago
5 0

Stanford v. Kentucky, was a United States Supreme Court case in the year 1989 that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime.

The Supreme Court in the year 2005,while handling the Roper v. Simmons' case ruled that the death penalty is a disproportionate punishment for juveniles, and thus it violates the Eighth Amendment to impose a death sentence on a youthful murderer who committed the crime before age 18.

Christopher Simmons, who was 17 at the time, committed a crime that led to a death sentence.

The Court said that the society views juveniles as categorically less culpable than the average criminal. The supreme court argued than a man only becomes culpable of any criminal act when he reaches the age of 18, and claimed at imposing a death penalty on a young child who is not old enough to take charge of his own actions is wrong.

The supreme court claimed that a juvenile who committed a heinous crime can be made to forfeit his fundamental rights rather than being murdered.

Anastasy [175]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

It was changed in Ropers v Simmons

Explanation:

• Stanford v Kentucky was a United States Supreme court case that authorized the imposition of death penalties to people who are 16 years and above at the time the crime was committed.

• Ropers v Simmons was a case in the U.S Supreme court which states that it was unconstitutional to enforce capital punishment for crimes committed while under 18 years. Christopher Simmons and his two friends murdered Shirley Cook and he confessed to committing the crime. The case was brought for trial and the appeal challenged the constitutionality of capital punishment for juveniles.

• The 5-4 decision in Ropers v Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford v Kentucky where offenders from 16 years were punished for crimes committed.

You might be interested in
Identify each of the following drugs.
nasty-shy [4]

Percocet is a narcotic.

6 0
3 years ago
What would this logo be BEST suited for?
Alex73 [517]
I would say ~a political campaign~ because red white and blue usually signifies America and politics

Hope this helps

Have a great day/night

Feel free to ask any questions
6 0
3 years ago
Should law enforcement agencies be allowed to use genetic information collected by private companies in criminal investigation
Elodia [21]

Answer: Genetic information of a person can only be used when the crime is unsolved violent crimes or the crime is a sexual offence. Other crimes where genetic information can be used is when the crime is a threat to the national security.

<u>Explanation:</u>

There are certain guide lines that have been set by the department of Justice of the United States of America. For every case, genetic information can not be used. Even if the suspect is identified using the genetic information, the sample must be compared with the forensic profile directly. Suspect can not be solely arrested on the basis that he has been identified by the use of the genetic information.

The crimes for which the genetic information can be used is for the cases when there are unsolved violent cases or the sexual offences. There can be use of genetic information when there are crimes which are threat to national security.

7 0
3 years ago
benefits of the people from the government in regards to formulation of welfare for social protection
Romashka-Z-Leto [24]

Answer:

whats the question

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
HELP ME NEED REAL ANSWER PLEASE I WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST
Fed [463]
Question 16: D. Sarcasm
Question 17: B. In health care it’s always acceptable
Question 18: C. Sexual Harassment
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • On what grounds are issue-advocacy ads paid for with "soft
    7·1 answer
  • Where does the CEO Of Racism lives?
    7·1 answer
  • ASAP!!!! Which of the following statements about school crossings is false?
    8·2 answers
  • Write short note on prohibition​
    14·1 answer
  • Former Major League Baseball player and radio game announcer Bob Uecker sought an injunction against Ann Ladd, alleging a six- o
    13·1 answer
  • C. political leaders
    12·1 answer
  • He author most likely includes this information to help the reader infer that
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following pieces of evidence might a digital forensics expert analyze?
    9·1 answer
  • For several weeks Bates used his noisy power lawn mower every Sunday morning at sunrise. Several neighbors asked him to mow his
    8·1 answer
  • Under which exception can a police officer legally enter a home and seize evidence without a warrant?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!