1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
earnstyle [38]
2 years ago
13

The National Security Strategy states that "deterrence based only upon the threat

History
1 answer:
laila [671]2 years ago
6 0

The National Security Strategy states that "deterrence based only upon the threat of retaliation is less likely to work against leaders of rogue states, is the true statement.

<h3>What is deterrence?</h3>

This is a security measure that is employed to demonstrate the strength and capability of a nation or individual in order to deter other attackers due to the possibility of reprisal.

Deterrence is effective, as can be seen, however relying too much on it against rogue governments based on the threat of reprisal may not be the best strategy.

Thus, it is a true statement.

For more information about Deterrence, click here:

brainly.com/question/28006908

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Which of the following represents a benefit of the Second Amendment to citizens of the United States?
Wewaii [24]
I think the third option would be a suitable answer.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
President Reagan’s speech at the Brandenburg gate commonlit
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer: here you go:

Explanation:

We come to Berlin, we American Presidents, because it's our duty to speak, in this place, of freedom. But I must confess, we're drawn here by other things as well: by the feeling of history in this city, more than 500 years older than our own nation; by the beauty of the Grunewald and the Tiergarten; most of all, by your courage and determination. Perhaps the composer, Paul Lincke, understood something about American Presidents. You see, like so many Presidents before me, I come here today because wherever I go, whatever I do: "Ich hab noch einen koffer in Berlin." [I still have a suitcase in Berlin.]

Our gathering today is being broadcast throughout Western Europe and North America. I understand that it is being seen and heard as well in the East. To those listening throughout Eastern Europe, I extend my warmest greetings and the good will of the American people. To those listening in East Berlin, a special word: Although I cannot be with you, I address my remarks to you just as surely as to those standing here before me. For I join you, as I join your fellow countrymen in the West, in this firm, this unalterable belief: Es gibt nur ein Berlin. [There is only one Berlin.]

...

And now the Soviets themselves may, in a limited way, be coming to understand the importance of freedom. We hear much from Moscow about a new policy of reform and openness. Some political prisoners have been released. Certain foreign news broadcasts are no longer being jammed. Some economic enterprises have been permitted to operate with greater freedom from state control. Are these the beginnings of profound changes in the Soviet state? Or are they token gestures, intended to raise false hopes in the West, or to strengthen the Soviet system without changing it? We welcome change and openness; for we believe that freedom and security go together, that the advance of human liberty can only strengthen the cause of world peace.

There is one sign the Soviets can make that would be unmistakable, that would advance dramatically the cause of freedom and peace. General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!

...

As I looked out a moment ago from the Reichstag, that embodiment of German unity, I noticed words crudely spray-painted upon the wall, perhaps by a young Berliner, "This wall will fall. Beliefs become reality." Yes, across Europe, this wall will fall. For it cannot withstand faith; it cannot withstand truth. The wall cannot withstand freedom.

5 0
4 years ago
The rights against unreasonable search and seizure, as well as against the quartering of soldiers, imply which of the rights lis
atroni [7]
Search and seizure would mean something like the government taking your cell phone and going through every message you've ever sent, or entering your home and searching through all your dresser drawers.  They need to have a court-approved reasonable cause for doing something that invasive.
Quartering of soldiers would mean soldiers would have the right to enter your home and expect you to provide them food and lodging.  That's pretty invasive too.
In either case, we're talking about invasions of your privacy, your personal space.  Court justices have used statements like those about search and seizure and quartering of soldiers to show that the constitution does give attention to citizen's right to privacy, even if not using the exact term "right to privacy."
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the United States and Soviet Union engage in the Space Race? In your view, we’re the benefits of the Space race worth th
exis [7]
Hey there!

To understand the Space Race, you must first understand the Cold War.

The Cold War wasn't really a War - in some views, it was just a competition. The US and the USSR were the largest superpowers the world had ever known - they had the most weapons, money, and power, ever. The US and the USSR were engaged in an arms race initially and were each racing to get the most nuclear weapons.

That was until the Soviet Union launched the Sputnik. The US could not let the USSR get control of space, and in 1969, launched the Apollo 11 to combat the USSR who had recently put the first man in space - by putting the first man on the Moon.

In my opinion, even though it was a competition, it was worth it. Think about it- would we have sent a man to the Moon afterward without all that pressure? Even nowadays, we would not have discovered what we already discovered without it and would not have sent any more rockets. Despite the cost, it has benefitted and will continue to benefit us in the long run.

Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Native Americans that share the same language,
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

tribe

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which is not a power of the president?
    5·1 answer
  • In Canada, Laws ___. A; Force all Canadians to speak English
    15·1 answer
  • Followers of Islam believe that Muhammad descended from<br> isacc<br> ishmael<br> jesus<br> moses
    13·1 answer
  • How does the structure of the section called “The
    8·2 answers
  • Did Rames the Great ruled for 6 years
    14·1 answer
  • Who are the 4 presidents after bush sr?
    8·2 answers
  • After World War I, immigration was based on __________. 1) employment skills 2) a quota system 3) political beliefs 4) nationali
    11·1 answer
  • Principles of cultural identity have been used to justify conflict.<br> True<br><br> False
    6·1 answer
  • Members of Congress agreed to the Missouri Compromise in an attempt to prevent serious conflict. Write a letter to a member of C
    11·1 answer
  • The first breakthroughs of the Industrial Revolution changed how ___________________ were made. (ships/textiles)
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!