Answer:
Taxation without representation. Oppression from Britain. Desire for independence and create their own laws. The intolerable acts. Etc.
Explanation:
Answer: An advocate for limited government would most likely oppose the modern american bureaucracy because the bureaucracy has become so immense and large that is no longer efficient.
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
1. Boston Tea Party is a political protest by the American colonists against the Tea Act of May 1773. It was conducted or primarily participated by the Sons of Liberty in Boston, Massachusetts in December 1773.
2. The cause of the Boston Tea Party was the imposition of the Tea Act in May 1773 by the Parliament of Great Britain.
3. Some of the Effects of the Boston Tea Party are the following:
(I). the clampdown of Boston Harbor until the British East India Company tea was fully paid for
(ii). It stopped the Massachusetts Constitution and stopped free elections of town officials.
(iii). the establishment of martial law in Massachusetts.
4. The Boston Tea Party was an important step in the sequence of events leading to the colonies declaring independence because it caused so much damages and destruction of private and public properties. This led to Great Britain imposing Intolerable Acts that were seen by the colonists as an infringement of constitutional rights, natural rights, and colonial charters.
5. The Boston Tea Party and the passing of the Intolerable Acts lead to colonists declaring independence (wanting freedom) from Great Britain because it inspired and united many colonists to fight against the overbearing of Great Britain. This led to the First Continental Congress in September 1774 and subsequently the Declaration of Independence and American Revolutionary War.
Answer:
Probably since back then most of the slaves were brought to the Us, so they arent citizens. All men only meant white men that owned property, unfortunetly
Explanation:
used my head, no citing or anything
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
I believe there should be certain limits, but not limited to "political correctness". Racial slurrs should nearly be at the limit for the freedom of expression, especially when they are directed at a person or group... Everybody loves their freedoms, but when you use your freedom to put others down (and not in a 'triggered' type of way) is that really right? Yes, there should be certain limits.
