The purpose of a conclusion is not a rote reiteration of the thesis and your arguments. A recap may help tie all your arguments together for the audience, especially in a long paper, but it is not enough. Just as you needed to interpret quoted material to ensure that your readers understood it the way you wanted them to, you need to interpret your arguments at the end of a paper to ensure that the audience will understand them in the same broader context that you do.
Ultimately, you want the conclusion to give your readers something extra to think about. And you want your own thoughts to stick with them long after they have finished reading the paper.
Answer:
c I hope this helps. If I'm wrong sorry
Answer:
I believe the best option to be letter D. He asks questions that are difficult to answer to help the missionaries understand his doubts.
Explanation:
The excerpt we are analyzing here was taken from the speech made by Red Jacket, a chief of the Wolf clan, in 1805. His purpose is to question the Christian missionaries' affirmation that there is only one religion to be followed and that Native-Americans' religion will keep them from entering Heaven when they die.
In this excerpt, Red Jacket asks the missionaries why they disagree so much about their own religion, why can't all Christians understand the Bible in the same way. He implies that, if the Bible and its teachings are supposed to be unquestionably right, then there should be no arguing between those who follow such teachings.
D. It doesn’t tell you why they are the best in the field
I believe the answer is A because it gives off a peaceful tone.