Answer:
<u>investing activities:</u>
acquisition of land (211,000)
sale of land (101,000)
<u>Operating Activities:</u>
gain on sale: NO EFFECT if direct method is used
adjusting the net income if the indirect method is used.
Explanation:
The cash disbursmenets and cash proceeds fro mthe purhcase and sale of land respectevely will appear as investing activities.
The gain on the sale will adjust the net incoem if the company used indirect method to determinatethe cash from operating activities.
As is a non-monetary term It will be removed.
If the company used the direct method there will be no mention to the gain on sale.
Prporety it is the long-term
Answer:
B) Resources
Explanation:
Since Lavender Furniture sold high quality products and had an efficient management, it was able to acquire and manage several assets including a larger plot of land for its facilities, better machinery, more employees and a highly recognized brand name. All of these are valuable resources, most of them are tangible (land, machinery and labor), but they were also able to develop an intangible resource such as a highly recognized brand name which can really be valuable.
Answer:
The other criteria could be about the expected delay that is acceptable to customer in the processing time of the server.
Explanation:
If the customers are ready to accept a certain delay then it can help making the decision whether to keep the server permanently on, as it consumes high power.
Also if it is not used all the time then keeping it on all the time would be wastage of resources.
Thus, the scheduling of the expected time at which they use, and the acceptable delay would provide a proper criteria for this.
Answer:
It is 3.25 times
Explanation:
EBITDA Multiple = Enterprise Value/ EBITDA
Where EBITDA = EBIT+Depreciation & Amortization
= $91,000+$157,000
=$248,000
Enterprise Value (EV) = Market value of the equity +Debt-Cash and Cash Equivalent
EV= $645,000+$215,000-$53,000
=$807,000
Hence, EBITDA Multiple = $807,000/$248,000
=3.25 times
EBITDA Multiple is used to compares a company’s Enterprise Value to its annual EBITDA.
