1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Montano1993 [528]
2 years ago
5

Explain and elaborate on TWO ways in which life in the Soviet Union was improved under Gorbachev, from how life had been under S

talin/Khrushchev/Brezhnev.
History
1 answer:
Free_Kalibri [48]2 years ago
6 0

Gorbachev's reforms are ultimately responsible for the Soviet collapse, which saw the end of Soviet superpower status, a massive reduction in the Soviet military's size and strength, the unilateral evacuation of all territories in Central and Eastern Europe occupied at great human cost in the Second World War, and a rapidly declining economy fragmented into fifteen separate states. Much of the argument that the Soviet political system and economy needed reform needed change to avoid collapse came directly from him - the phrase "Era of Stagnation" to describe the Brezhnev years is actually a piece of Gorbachev's rhetoric. However there seems to be a strong case (made by Stephen Kotkin in Armageddon Averted), that while the Soviet economy was growing at ever slower rates, and increasingly unable to close the ever-present gap in living standards between the USSR and the West, probably could have continued to muddle on - there was no imminent danger of political and economic collapse in 1985. It's also important to note that Gorbachev's reforms did not cause the collapse of the USSR on purpose, and Gorbachev was always committed to maintaining the union in some reformed shape under an economic system that was still socialist. However, his reforms both began to pick apart the centralized economy without really creating new institutions, which caused severe economic disruptions, and his political reforms unleashed new political movements outside his control, while all of these reforms antagonized more hardline members of the nomenklatura (party establishment). Ultimately he lost control of the situation. The Soviet system was highly-centralized and governed in a top-down approach, and it was Gorbachev who put reforms into motion and also removed members of the Soviet government and Communist party who opposed reforms. Gorbachev's period tends to get divided into roughly three periods: a period of reform, a period of transformation, and a period of collapse. The period of reform lasted roughly from 1985 to 1988, in which Gorbachev and his supporters in the government (notably Eduard Shevardnadze, Gorbachev's foreign minister and the future President of Georgi, and Aleksandr Yakovlev, Gorbachev's ally on the Politburo and the intellectual driver of reforms) tried a mixture of moderate reforms and moral suasion to revitalize the Soviet economy as it was, echoing Khrushchev's reforms of 20 years previous. While the goal was a revitalization of Soviet society and the economy, there was a very strong focus on morality: this period notably featured the anti-alcoholism/prohibition campaign, and very public campaigns against corruption (Dmitry Furman called this a "sort of Marxist Protestantism"). When these efforts did not secure the results that Gorbachev and his reformers desired, more far-reaching reforms were pursued in the 1988-1990 period. This is when Gorbachev made massive changes to Soviet foreign policy, such as withdrawing from Afghanistan in 1989, announcing unilateral cuts to military spending and forces at the UN in 1988, and more or less cutting the USSR's Eastern European satellite states in 1989. On the domestic sphere, this is when Gorbachev pushed through major political changes to the Soviet system, pushing through a new Congress of People's Deputies to be filled through semi-free elections, removing the Communist Party's monopoly of power and creating the office of President of the USSR for himself in 1990. This is also the period when glasnost ("openness", ie the lifting of censorship) took off, and these all were largely attempts to establish a new base of support for continued reforms once it became clear to Gorbachev that most of the Communist Party was uninterested in this. These reforms ushered in the 1990-1991 chaos, at which point Gorbachev essentially lost control. Falling oil prices and the crackdown on alcohol sales (which were a massive part of the Soviet budget), plus Gorbachev's loosening of management and sales restrictions on state firms while maintaining most of their subsidies, plus plans for importing of new Western machine tools and technology to revitalize the economy, seriously destabilized the Soviet budget, and caused the government to turn to the printing presses to cover ever increasing deficits.

You might be interested in
Why can Fillmore's letter be seen as a masterful combination of salesmanship, diplomacy, and firmness
nekit [7.7K]
Fillmore's letter was full of diplomacy, commercial ability and firmness, the president always referred to the Japanese authority as "your majesty", this represented the diplomatic recognition of the one who governed Japan at the time, besides that, he also treated him very kindly so that Japan agreed to trade with the United States, and at the same time exhort him firmly to abandon the old policies that restricted them from doing business with foreign countries on the one hand, and open up to new forms of trade, explaining how, when and what they could trade.
8 0
3 years ago
Which philosopher developed the concept of postmodernism
ddd [48]
The answer to your question would be, John Stuart Mill
7 0
3 years ago
We’re the founders wrong to want to keep the presidency free of partisan differences?
vodomira [7]

Answer:

No, they weren't

Explanation:

The decisions made by the president will affect all Citizens, regardless of their political affiliation.  By keeping the presidency free of partisan differences, the founding fathers hoped that the president could create policies that are suitable for the Country's needs and  benefited the majority of the people. O

The founding fathers  believe that It is impossible for the president to satisfy all citizens. Each citizens have their own interest which might oppose the interest of other citizens.

4 0
3 years ago
What type of system of government was established under the Articles of Confederation?
shutvik [7]

Answer:

weak national government comprising a one-house legislature.

Explanation:

The Congress had the power to declare war, sign treaties, and settle disputes between states, though it could not tax its states or regulate trade.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Authoritarianism definition​
Sergeu [11.5K]
Favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are two states with extensive native american reservation
    9·2 answers
  • How do you think life in big cities was different from life on form and in small town
    15·1 answer
  • How are the elements of photography used in the movie coraline
    8·2 answers
  • What effect did the korean war have on domestic politics in the United States​
    13·2 answers
  • Why did some early members of the women’s rights movement in the united states argue against pursuing women’s suffrage?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the state of Maryland believe that it could ignore federal banking policy established with the creation of the Second Ba
    7·2 answers
  • Identify the point of view through the tunnel
    6·1 answer
  • What new form of measurement did the ancient Egyptians create?
    5·2 answers
  • The President is only allowed to serve two full terms in office, preventing one person from being President for too long. Why do
    9·1 answer
  • What was one major effect of industrialization on American society?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!