Traditionally, zoologists have placed birds in their own class, Aves. More recently, molecular evidence has shown that birds are
more closely related to reptiles than their anatomy reveals. Genetically, birds are more closely related to crocodiles than crocodiles are to turtles. Thus, bird anatomy has become highly modified as they have adapted to flight, without their genes having undergone nearly as much change. Taxonomically, what should be done with the birds? A: The rest of the reptiles should be reclassified as a subclass within the class Aves.
B: Birds should be reclassified, and their new taxon should be the subclass Aves. Genetic similarity trumps morphological dissimilarity in cases where morphological traits are uninformative.
C:The classification scheme should remain the same because of historical precedence.
D: The traditional stance is correct. Such dramatic morphological change as undergone by birds indicates that birds should be placed in their own order, separate from the reptiles.
parenthetical instructions under CPT® code 33690 include thus: For right and left pulmonary artery banding in a single ventricle {for example, hybrid approach stage 1} , use 33620) and (Do not report modifier 63 in conjunction with 33690)
The answer is morph.
This could be caused by genetic polymorphisms
or variation in the effect of the environment
on each genotype. To be classified as such, morphs must occupy the same habitat
at the same time and belong to a panmictic population (one with random mating).
