1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naya [18.7K]
3 years ago
15

Which US group did not share in the overall prosperity of the 1920's and struggled more than others to make ends meet?

History
2 answers:
Firlakuza [10]3 years ago
5 0
Farmer's struggled more during the 1920's, because everyone one focused on factory production
Yanka [14]3 years ago
5 0
Farmers produced to many crops....farmers is your answer
You might be interested in
What or who did the colonists depend on during/after the seven-year war?
max2010maxim [7]
It was the French and Indian war.
4 0
3 years ago
list the reasons why many people in France were critical of a) the nobility; b) the king; c) the clergy.
garik1379 [7]

They didn't need to pay any expenses whatsoever. They were the main ones who could hold vital positions. Officers in the armed force. Nobles controlled peasants. They didn't need to pay most duties and gathered tolls from individuals utilizing streets and markets. Numerous nobles and clergy lived in awesome extravagance in chateaux and castles.


5 0
2 years ago
Explain what the great compromise was? <br><br> Help me please
grin007 [14]

Answer:

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

Explanation:

Hope I helped!

3 0
2 years ago
What is a possible drawback to direct democracy
erma4kov [3.2K]
The people can get angry with the choises the government make and can over run the system.
8 0
3 years ago
How did the farmers alliances begin a crusade against big businesses?
andre [41]
<span>they protested that railroads , as monopolies, charged whatever rates they wanted and complained that banks set interest rates at ridiculously high levels.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In what way did industrialization in the United States contribute to the rise of the second Ku Klux Klan in the early twentieth
    11·1 answer
  • As English explorers spread throughout the New World, various settlements were established. Each of those settlements dealt with
    15·1 answer
  • Which progressive reform allowed the voters to approve or reject laws passed by the legislature?
    14·1 answer
  • Write a summary about the Geography and Climate of Virginia. What website did you get the information from?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was geographical location important during the emancipation proclamation?
    13·1 answer
  • This program shows young offenders how terrible prison life is.
    14·2 answers
  • The religion developed in reaction to Brahmanism and which preached a doctrine of
    8·1 answer
  • Where did totem poles originate?
    10·2 answers
  • what is the difference between the soldiers feelings about maceth at the end of the play ad their feeligs about him at the begin
    15·1 answer
  • ______ allows Congress to exercise powers that are not listed in the constitution 1)article 1, section 1 2)The "necessary and pr
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!