Patrick Henry was against a strong, centralized national government and constitution because he wished to see real, structural limitations on the new government’s power, such as taking away its authority to tax. He felt that a strong government <span>betrayed the principles of the Revolution.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Anti-Federalist Papers and explain how it supports your position on the ratification of the Constitution.
I am going to choose a quote from Anti-Federalist No. 3, "New Constitution Creates a National Government, Will not Abate Foreign Influence, Dangers of Civil War and Despotism," written by John Francis Mercer. It was published in the Maryland Gazette on March 7, 1788.
This is the quote:<em> "In a national government, unless cautiously and fortunately administered, the disputes will be the deeprooted differences of interest, where part of the empire must be injured by the operation of general law." </em>
That is why antideferalists heavily opposed the creation of a strong central government, as was the intention of Federalists such as Jhon Jay and Alexander Hamilton. I agree with antifederalists like Thomas Jefferson, who believed in a simpler form of government, not despotic, that granted rights to the citizens. These rights were established in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States, drafted by federalist James Madison.
USA intervened in Korea and Vietnam as war efforts and in Greece and Turkey as coups.
Explanation:
In Turkey the US government aided a coup by the military to overthrow the government which in turn led to a regressive government to be placed in there.
A similar thing happened in Greece when a socialist party was elected into the Country with affiliations or alleged ones with the Soviet Union.
Korea was invaded by the USA in support of the south during the Korean war so as to stop the communist North from taking over all of the Korea under the influence of USSR.
Similar thing happened in Vietnam but it was not successful and Vietnam did fall to the communist army after US departure.
Answer:
China has no use for democracy. It needs a strong leader like they have right now, Xi Jinping
Explanation:
Answer:
Both sides of the slavery argument had strong supporters and both disliked the other side. The cultural (social) differences between the North and South also caused conflict and added to sectional differences. In the North, society was much more urban (cities) and industrial while the majority of people were employed.
Explanation: