A person can think however they want. Actions, like many have said, define a person in the end. Someone can advocate for peace with malicious intent, but they will still likely be remembered for advocating peace and not for their impure motivations. If these contradicting images are revealed to the public, that is still an act against that person, and is no longer a thought.
However, this is only from the public's view. When it comes to people, they may as well be the embodiment of their thoughts. Everything is fueled by something. The same person who seeds their own goals under the guise of peace will not think of themselves as one who acts with the intentions of bringing peace. They will be looking to call forth whatever it is that they want, and be aware that what they present to the public is not the truth.
So, both points are arguable. It depends on whether you value the individual or the community. Actions are what are remembered, and thoughts are a person's reason. Even today, this comes into relevancy because people want to know why certain figures in history did what they did. Thoughts make a person human, after all. Without thought, seperation of man and beast would be nigh impossible. Without action, man would have been left behind long ago. Both thought and action are important indeed.
How did slaves in Ancient Greece differ from models of slavery in later societies?
Answer- Slavery was not connected with race in the ancient world. People were slaves because their side lost a recent war or as punishment for a crime (something still theoretically allowed in the US). They were not necessarily of a different race to the slave owners.
People didn’t necessarily see slaves as inferior. Slaves were sometimes employed as secretaries and tutors and it was prestigious to own an intelligent, educated, slave.
Answer:
they already knew that Kino was coming to sell his pearl that day
Explanation:
The conflict that occurs when a person holds two contradictory attitudes or thoughts is called cognitive dissonance. The correct answer is C.
Projective
tests
Psychological
tests comes two ways:
The
structure psychological tests or, objectives tests and unstructured psychological
tests or, also called projective tests. By what you are referring the responder
strongly asserts a projective tests which in definition comes with an
unambiguous stimuli or no paper test just drawings and images. If what the
responder’s suggesting is correct you are referring to the Rorschach projective
tests, these tests are a figure symmetrically placed in an inkblot that lets
you visualize or create a mental picture out of it, and makes you describe what
you in see much detail as you can.
