Duty, in a way, contributed to the shallowness and failure of Ivan's life. Not because duty in itself is bad, but because it has become Ivan's only preoccupation, apart from pleasant life. Tolstoy's negative view of duty is seen in the second half of this sentence: "he considered his duty all things that were so designated by people in authority". So, we are talking about duty as Ivan sees it, and Ivan sees it as it was designated by people in authority. That means, Ivan structures his life and his priorities according to the view of those above him. His only ambition is to try and climb the social ladder. When he fails to do it, he is disappointed and has to find another obsession - of course, materialistic one. And that is the decoration of his new house. That's when he falls down and injures himself - so, indirectly, his materialism has cost him his health and, ultimately, his life.
Im not 100% but i think the answer is d. :}
"The second count alleges a conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, to-wit, to use the mails for the transmission of matter declared to be non-mailable by title 12, 2, of the Act of June 15, 1917"
According to the bolded lines, what is one reason for Schenck’s indictment?
<em>The answer is B. He tried to send something through the mail illegally. </em>
In the text they tell us that the first charges that are presented are for trying to cause insubordination in the military and naval forces of the United States, this means they don't like how EEUU are recruting and enlisting people for war, which indicates that the three answers A, C and D would go against the ideals of the accused. Moreover, the bold lines inform us that the accused tried to use the mail to send confidential information of the United States, which violates a law making it an illegal act.
What is the most useful next step in the writing process for Lauren?
The answer is C. Determine how these sources relate to one another
She needs to understand why are these lightning strikes happening so close and compare if what the eye-witness saw is similar to what the storm chaser said. In order to write a conclusion and make an organizational plan, Lauren needs to understand the connections between her sources so she can write.
If my answer helped you please give me five stars and best answer. I'm trying to level up.
It’s probably best to be straight up and ask. But if you don’t want to do that, you could just mention her up in passing. Such as “Hey did you see what Anna posted?” (let’s say Anna) or maybe some thing like “hey I literally thought I saw Anna at Walmart” and then when this person is somehow brought up, you could be like “speaking of which, I didn’t see her at the party? Everything okay?”
English darling ...,English
