Based on the information in the article, the author believes e-books are better than print books.
<h3>What is the article about?</h3>
The article makes a comparison between printed and e-books.
<h3>What is the positon of the author about this topic?</h3>
The author supports the idea e-books are better as he explains:
- E-books are environmentally friendly.
- E-books give you tips to read.
- E-books save space.
Note: This question is incomplete because the article is not given; here is the complete question:
Question:
According to the article, the author believes_______
Options:
- E-books are better than print books.
- E-books and print books are both ecologically friendly.
- Print books are better than e-books.
- E-books and print books both have advantages and disadvantages, so most readers use both.
Article:
So now you know what an e-reader is. But you still may be wondering why they put printed books to shame. E-readers are superior to printed books because they save space, are environmentally friendly, and provide helpful reading tips and tools that printed books do not.
E-readers are superior to printed books because they save space. The average e-reader can store thousands of digital books, providing a veritable library at your fingertips. What is more, being the size and weight of a thin hardback, the e-reader itself is relatively petite. It is easy to hold and can fit in a pocketbook or briefcase easily. This makes handling ponderous behemoths such as War and Peace, Anna Karenina, and Les Misérables a breeze. Perhaps the only drawback to the space-saving aspect of an e-reader is that it requires you to find new things to put on your shelves.
Learn more about E-books in: brainly.com/question/8586030
#SPJ1
