Suppose an initial increase in government expenditure increases output by $50,000. if the size of the multiplier was 1.0, the size of the initial increase in government expenditure was $50000.
<h3>How to solve for the change in multiplier</h3>
We can solve for the change in multiplier by using this formula which is Change in output / multiplier
The change in output is 50000 while the change in multiplier is 1
This would give us 50000 / 1 = 50000
<h3>What is the government multiplier?</h3>
This is the terminology that is used in economics to refer to the fact that an additional spending by the government of an economy would cause the income of the household to rise.
Read more on government multiplier here: brainly.com/question/15883095
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. $ 4,123
Explanation:
For accounting purposes we will consider as cost to ivnentory all the necessarycost incurred to get the merchandise ready for use. Therefore the returns and dsicount decrease the inventory as they weren't cost incurred.
The freight will count as necessary and incurred thus, added.
Invoice nominal 4,800
returns
4,800 x 20% = <u> (960)</u>
balance 3,840
discount 2% <u> (76.8) </u>
merchandise cost 3.763,2
freights-in <u> 360 </u>
total cost 4,123.2
The answer for this question is: $126,749 per violation
The ground for this huge amount is by wilful violate the rules, the employer basically putting his/her employee's life in danger on purpose, so the punishment for this should be a lot higher.
This amount is exactly ten times the amount of penalty imposed to the employer who commits willful violation ($ 12,675)
Out of the choices given, the economic goals focuses on funding technological advances in efficiency production. The correct answer is A.