Rusty is exhibiting "Bullying".
Bullying is undesirable, forceful conduct among school matured youngsters that includes a genuine or saw control irregularity. The conduct is rehashed, or can possibly be rehashed, after some time. The two children who are tormented and who spook others may have genuine, enduring issues.
Hi!
Your answer is B.
It is <u><em>not</em></u> A because this doesn't really make sense. It's not the best answer.
It <u><em>is</em></u> B because, in sentences, the words around it will likely give the information you need to infer what the word means.
(For example, if I were to say "<em>She was </em><u><em>continuously</em></u><em> singing, for yesterday she sang for 4 straight hours, and it was extremely annoying</em>", pretend you do not know what "continuously" means. By using the words around it, such as "4 straight hours" you can predict that it means "never stopping".)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> C because not every single sentence contains a synonym or antonym.
(See the sentence above. The antonym of "continuously" would be 'never' or 'sometimes' or possibly 'discontinous'. There isn't always an antonym or synonym there, is there?)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> D because not every single word is defined in a passage.
(When you open an average book, is there just an entire page(s) dedicated to every single definition of a word? Most often, no, there is not.)
I'm assuming these are the options.
<span>enforcing state laws <--- Is your answer.
representing the state in the U.S. Congress
revising the state constitution
deciding on state criminal cases</span>
No they didnt t<span>he </span>Greeks became<span> skilled seafaring people and traders.</span>
Answer:
3.The oranges on the window seal along with the statue of St. Margaret, the saint of childbirth, might allude to the desire for a child.
Explanation:
Actually, the decorations on the window seal revealed not only their wealth but how educated they were and what they can spend their money on.
So, No. 3 statement DOES NOT apply to the Arnolfini Portrait by Jan Van Eyck.
The little dog at her feet in the painting symbolizes and demonstrates fidelity and loyalty among the couples.
Madame de Pompadour in the 18th century when she was the official chief mistress of King Louis XV of France in several of portraits included a small black dog. It is a classical artistic motif which is obviously used by her in most of her portraits. She used it as a symbol of fidelity.
The portrait also symbolized that he was committing the business of the home to the wife while he was away.
Furthermore, Van Eyck used linear perspective to create the room in which the couple reside.