The answer is 140 feet because 10×14 is 140
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
EH=w
then it is as simple as pluggin in
gh=4(eh)-51
<h3>Answer: Draw a straight line through (0,-7) and (1,-5)</h3>
Explanation:
You could use any two points you want. For me, the easiest is when x = 0. Plug this into the equation to get
y = 2x-7
y = 2(0)-7
y = -7
So we have x = 0 and y = -7 pair up to get (0,-7) as our first point. This is the y intercept.
Repeat for x = 1
y = 2x-7
y = 2(1)-7
y = -5
So (1,-5) is another point on this line. You only need two points at minimum to graph a straight line.
Answer:
We <em>fail to reject H₀ </em>as there is insufficient evidence at 0.5% level of significance to conclude that the mean hours of TV watched per day differs from the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a two-tailed test.
We first need to calculate the test statistic. The test statistic is calculated as follows:
Z_calc = X - μ₀ / (s /√n)
where
- X is the mean number of hours
- μ₀ is the mean that the sociologist claims is true
- s is the standard deviation
- n is the sample size
Therefore,
Z_calc = (3.02 - 3) / (2.64 /√(1326))
= 0.2759
Now we have to calculate the z-value. The z-value is calculated as follows:
z_α/2 = z_(0.05/2) = z_0.025
Using the p-value method:
P = 1 - α/2
= 1 - 0.025
= 0.975
Thus, using the positive z-table, you will find that the z-value is
1.96.
Therefore, we reject H₀ if | Z_calc | > z_(α/2)
Thus, since
| Z_calc | < 1.96, we <em>fail to reject H₀ </em>as there is insufficient evidence at 0.5% level of significance to conclude that the mean hours of TV watched per day differs from the claim.
Answer:
C) 153.9 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
14 ÷ 2 = 7
π = 3.14
3.14×7×7 = 153.9 in²
hope this helps!
