The correct answer is D) unstable external attribution. Attributions are the inferences people make about the causes of events. There are internal/external and stable/unstable attributions.
When people make a stable attribution, they infer that an event due to stable factors. When making an unstable attribution, they infer that an event or behavior is due to unstable, temporary factors.
For example, Lisa gets a F on his sociology term paper. If he attributes the grade to the fact that he always has bad luck, it is a stable attribution. If he attributes the grade to the fact that he didn’t have much time to study, it is an unstable attribution.
Answer:
E. Mexican products would be more expensive, while U.S.-made products would become comparatively less expensive.
Explanation:
Imagine the following scenario:
- USD: united states dollar
- There is no cost in shipping or transport
if the fixed relation is 2 MXN = 1 USD. Say you want to buy a TV that costs 200MXN in Mexico or 100USD in the US. That means that buying a TV costs the same in each country.
Now suppose that the TV price in Mexico, due to inflation, changes to MXN 300.
If you had 300MXN in your wallet, you could:
- use MXN 200 to buy 100USD and use those to buy the TV, and have MXN 100 left, to buy other stuff.
- or
- you could buy the TV in Mexico, you would expend all the money.
That mean that, with the same amount of MXN you can buy more things in the US than in Mexico.
Another way to think about this is.
Say you are a mexican, if there is high inflation, the price of everything will rise, if you considder the exchange rate as another price that means that everything will cost more, except the US Dollar, which will stay in the same price
I believe the answer is: B. <span> The state governments determine the powers of the central government.
In the confederate system of government, the states held the final decision in determining the type of regulations they want to created.
The role of the central government in this system is only to monitor and assist the activities initiated by the states.</span><span />
The paraphrase of the information regarding marriage is illustrated below.
<h3>How to explain the information?</h3>
Marriage being a requirement was a result of the circumstances that were bringing civilization to the colony. The collaboration of wives in marriage revealed their means of subsistence. The wives had trading value because the husbands could exchange them for goods like tobacco. Marriage was viewed throughout the colonial era as a requirement for civilisation. It was designed to tame males and offer them a new perspective on the colony that was more mature and civilized. Colonial males were delivered mail-order brides in an arranged marriage. Women today have a greater sense of independence and freedom.
The husband is now viewed as a guardian for the wife rather than the wife's superior. Now, choosing to be married is a decision driven by love. Marriage as a personal decision was impacted by democracy. People's freedom and ability to make their own decisions were impacted by the country's self-governance and the slowing of independence. As families had fewer children in chapter two, I think marriage will change in the future as a result of people having even fewer or no children. Also delaying childbirth due to the increased focus on careers many women today. I think couples will wait longer to even get married or forego marriage altogether while still having children together in the future.
Learn more about marriage on:
brainly.com/question/1265280
#SPJ1
The factors that led to marriage as a necessity were bringing civilization to the colony. Wives' cooperation to marriage reflected their means to survive. The wives carried trade value as the men could sell them for trade such as tobacco. In the colonial years, marriage was seen as a necessary arrangement for civilization. It was intended to tame men and give them a different view, more mature and tamed towards the colony. There was arranged marriage where colonial men were sent mail ordered brides. In current days, women gained a sense of individuality and freedom. The husband is no longer seen as the authoritative figure over the wive but as a protector to her. Marriage has changed to an option that is motivated by love. Democracy had an affect on marriage as a free choice. Self governing of the country and the Deceleration of Independence had an affect on people's independence and personal decision making. As chapter two went over families having less children, I believe marriage will change in the future by people having even fewer or no children. Also, waiting even longer to have children as women are now focusing on careers more. I believe in the future, couples are also waiting longer to even get married or avoiding marriage all together but still having children together and living together as a family.
Write a paraphrase of the information.
