1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Solnce55 [7]
2 years ago
12

How would Federalists most likely respond to this?

History
2 answers:
aleksklad [387]2 years ago
7 0

For the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

<h3>Who were the Federalists?</h3>

The Federalists were American Founding Fathers who wanted a strong government and strong executive branch.

The Federalists were opposed by the anti-Federalists who wanted a weaker central government.

The Federalists did not vote for a bill of rights because they regarded the constitution as sufficient, unlike the anti-Federalists who demanded a bill of rights to be part of the Constitution.

Thus, for the Federalists, their <u>most likely response</u> is D. They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

Learn more about Federalists and Anti-Federalists at brainly.com/question/267094

#SPJ1

Sergio [31]2 years ago
3 0

Option D. The way that the federalists would respond to this would be They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

<h3>Who were the federalists?</h3>

This was the name that was used to refer to the people that were in support of the United States having a central government.

They wanted a federal government that would be in the helm of affairs of the states and all of the citizens.

<h3>complete question</h3>

Read the excerpt from the Publius.

In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.

—Publius

How would Federalists most likely respond to this?

They would agree but doubt the Constitution could make that happen.

They would doubt that any central government could meet these goals.

They would argue that the government does not need to control itself.

They would agree and be confident that the Constitution meets those goals.

Read more on the federalists here: brainly.com/question/412270

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
how has the initiative process helped more citizens better influence lawmaking in their particular state​
Rudiy27

Answer:

The initiative process helped more citizens better influence lawmaking in their particular state​ is discussed below in details.

Explanation:

In the electioneering of the United States, the process of initiatives and elections provide voters of many U.S. states to install new enactment on a public ballot, or to overwhelm law that has newly been legislated by a legislature on a vote for a public vote.

The initiative is an authority possessed to the citizens to introduce legislation, by appeal, that would establish, amend, or revoke a City Law or Code requirement.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following could affect the human population?
ruslelena [56]
A deadly virus emerges that can pass from human to human.
I hope I helped in any sort of way, if not please not me know kindly.
Good luck with your future studies.
Cheers,
Mabel L.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What neighboring countries influenced the development of japan
Talja [164]

China, Hong Kong, Vietnam and many other small countries

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think congress is specifically forbidden from some actions?
Delicious77 [7]
The United States Congress is specifically forbidden from some actions because the Congress might be wrongly influenced to make certain changes that can effect the general people of the country. The constitution might get affected and the country might lose the virtues on which the founding fathers created the constitution. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the period of pax romana, the roman empire began to weaken due to
Sveta_85 [38]
Pax romana was a time of peace so the army was laid back at the time. the the crisis of the third century struck resulting in civil war, invasion, <span>plague and economic troubles. the empire nearly collasped from all of this.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Josiah strong write this . The perdominance of the Anglo Saxon race
    13·1 answer
  • What concept was the punishment for breaking a law based on?
    8·1 answer
  • Who was the second president?<br><br>A.John Adams<br>B.George Washington <br>C.Thomas Jefferson
    12·2 answers
  • What effect did trading with egypt have on nubian civilzation​
    12·1 answer
  • What trails did you take to go the the gold rush
    15·1 answer
  • Someone who describes herself as "conservative" would be<br> most likely to join
    10·1 answer
  • Why couldn't allies land in northwestern part of France ww2
    5·1 answer
  • PLS HURRY THIS IS DUE IN A SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST
    12·1 answer
  • NO LINKS NO FUNNY BUSINESS I WANT A STRAIGHT CORRECT ANSWER
    7·2 answers
  • The injustices that Chavez lists in the last part of his speech include racism. Lack of voting rights. Assault. Unsafe working c
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!