1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kakasveta [241]
3 years ago
13

Senator joseph mccarthy's power began to unravel when he made reckless charges about communist influence in: the democratic part

y. the u.s. army. ivy league colleges. the eisenhower administration. the media.
History
1 answer:
mixer [17]3 years ago
3 0
The correct answer is the US Army.

McCarthy's reign of accusing individuals of being communism really begins in the early 1950's. After claiming he has a list of 205 members of the State Department who are known communists, he catapults to national prominence. Time after time, McCarthy accuses individuals from all walks of life of being communist. Even though he was extremely popular in the beginning of his search for communists, he became discredited due to this claims against the US Army.
You might be interested in
Which foreign policy is aimed at gaining control of other lands? nationalism internationalism isolationism imperialism
Effectus [21]
I believe imperialism because it means gaining on one country's power 
7 0
3 years ago
/explain and evaluate the views of anaximander regarding the nature of substance.
chubhunter [2.5K]

Early Greek philosopher Anixamander (ca. 610 – 545 BC) was a monist.  That means he believed that ultimately there is just one sort of substance underlying all the different things we see in the physical universe. He put forth the idea that this single underlying substance of all things is something beyond our experience.  He called it the ἄπειρον (<em>apeiron</em>), which means "the boundless" or "the limitless."  Anaximander was reacting to the views of Thales, a previous thinker from his same town, Miletus, who had suggested that there was one underlying substance to all things, and that <u>water</u> was that essential element.  Anaximander objected to Thales' thought, because water is something we all see and experience readily in the perceived world.  He believed any underlying or base-level substance, from which water and any other physical stuff originated, had to be something beyond the boundaries of our present experience, or "the boundless."

One evaluation of Anaximander's views came from another Milesian philosopher who followed him:  Anaximenes.  Anaximenes saw the theory of Anaximander as dodging the question, "What is the main ingredient of all things in the universe."  By saying, "It's boundless; it's something we don't know," had he really answered anything?  So Anaximenes dismissed the view of Anaximander ... but didn't agree with Thales either.  Anaximenes proposed that air was the underlying element of all physical phenomena.

You'll have to decide for yourself what you think of Anaximander's "boundless" theory.

8 0
3 years ago
which muslim empire-the umayyads, the ottomans, or the moguls-treated the non-muslim subjects the most fairly? the least fairly?
VladimirAG [237]

The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.


The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).

6 0
3 years ago
This is a sketch of an ivory artifact. Why would it be considered a secondary source?
levacccp [35]

Answer:

it's a secondary source

Explanation:

since it was drawn by someone looking at it and it wasn't seen by the person looking at the photograph i think

5 0
3 years ago
Evaluate and explain the costs of Stalin's Five-Year Plan.
Inga [223]

Explanation:

Stalin's First Five-Year Plan, adopted by the party in 1928, called for rapid industrialization of the economy, with an emphasis on heavy industry. It set goals that were unrealistic—a 250 percent increase in overall industrial development and a 330 percent expansion in heavy industry alone.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following reformers believed that there should be no separation between politics and religion?
    13·2 answers
  • The significance of the elongated earlobes on the Buddha is that
    14·2 answers
  • Who sets the salary of the president? 
    8·1 answer
  • What economic factors and conditions converged in the late 1920s to plunge the nation into the Great Depression?
    7·2 answers
  • At the START of the war, which countries were on the side of the Central Powers? Check all that apply.
    6·2 answers
  • 5. Why do you think a bill has to pass both houses of Congress to reach the President's<br> desk?
    6·1 answer
  • How did technology affect the way things were made
    14·1 answer
  • Hy did Lincoln issue the Emancipation Proclamation?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of these was the most recent of the Four Great Inventions?
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the diagram?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!