Kant believed in something he called the <em>categorical imperative. </em>A categorical imperative is a particular moral position that holds in all possible situations - an unshakable moral law, in other words. For imperatives like "do not kill," this seems reasonable, but for others, such as "do not lie," it gets a little hairier.
Imagine a scenario where a murderer comes to your door and asks if you've see your friend around. Moments before, your friend came to you telling you about the murderer, asking if they could hide at your house. Kant would say you're obligated not to lie, so your options are to either shut the door on the murderer (not a great idea) or give away your friend's hiding place (an even worse idea). You can see how a little white lie wouldn't hurt, and would in fact <em>prevent harm from happening</em>. If you were a sworn Kantian, it might play out badly for everyone involved.
To answer your question in light of that, Kantian ethics hold that certain moral standards are universal and impose a duty on <em>all </em>humans. Do not lie. Period.
The answer is "it is described as social control".
We can define social control formally as Outside authorizations upheld by government to keep the foundation of confusion or anomie in the public eye. Social control which infers the social intercourse is controlled as per built up and perceived gauges, is complete, supreme and successful to empower request, train and commonality; and to dishearten, and if require be, to rebuff the aberrance.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
cuz like its the best way for folks to keep up and be on the hook.
Here is the answer that would best complete the given statement above. The upper-level management of nationwide sales corporation wants to fire andy because he is a nonproductive employee and using a utilitarian approach to business ethics, management would probably consider <span>the costs and benefits of retaining a nonproductive employee.</span>
