A self-liquidating premium is one in which the extra goods is supplied at a discount from the retail price but at a level sufficient to pay the item's cost.
When a consumer is expected to pay a specific monetary value for a gift or item, this is referred to as a self-liquidating premium. Premium Offer refers to value-added items, travel, or services offered to consumers in exchange for purchasing an alcoholic beverage product, also known as "product gift" or "gift with sales promotion.". Small gifts are supplied with the box as an in-or out-of-package premium. A nice example of this is the All Black collectors' cards included in Sanitarium Weet Bix boxes.
To know more about self liquidating click here:
brainly.com/question/14396469
#SPJ4
Answer:
Courts place a narrow interpretation on the term property.
Explanation:
No authority can be held to be incapable of producing any verdict. Here this statement reflects that the court would not be able to understand the case and facts associated with it as the court can clearly understand all the facts.
That the jury is well versed with all the education and experience and the court in no manner can produce any narrow interpretation for the term of property as it will clearly reflect the misunderstanding of facts enclosed with the case.
Thus the above statement is false in this regard.
Answer:
A. not affect the total value of any of the equity accounts.
Explanation:
A balance sheet can be defined as a financial statement of an organization which is typically used to record financial informations liabilities, capital, shareholder's equity, assets, debts at a specific period of time.
In respect to a balance sheet, a stock split will not affect the total value of any of the equity accounts.
A stock split can be defined as a process in which a company divides its existing shares of the stock it owns into multiple new shares to its shareholders in proportion to the amount of their holdings. Thus, a stock split will not affect the total value of any of the equity accounts with respect to a balance sheet.
Answer:
Does the agreement specify that ownership of the asset transfers to the lessee? NO
Does the agreement contain a bargain purchase option? NO
Is the lease termequal to75% or more of the expected NOeconomic life of the asset? NO (4 < (.75 X 6))
Is the present value of the minimum lease payments equalto or greater than 90% of the fair value of the asset? NO
10,000 X 3.72325
= (37233 < (.9 X 44,000))
Annuity due : n=4, i=5%.
Does the agreement specify that ownership of the asset transfers to the lessee? NO
Does the agreement contain a bargain purchase option? YES
Is the lease termequal to75% or more of the expected NOeconomic life of the asset? Yes (4 > .75X5)
Is the present value of the minimum lease payments equalto or greater than 90% of the fair value of the asset? NO
35,456 < (.9 X 43,000)
10,000 X 3.54595
Ordinary annuity
n=4, i = 5%.
<span>In the context of swot analysis, the marketers at beta inc. are most likely to consider this situation as a threat.
The new competitor threatens Beta inc. by offering the same consumers, that Beta inc. targets, the same, or similar, products for lower prices than Beta inc. These consumers, given the choice between the new competitor and Beta inc., will most likely do business with the new competitor; for reasons aforementioned.</span>