If this is sociology, then the answer is that in any crowd, anywhere in the world, people have many different motivations.
Hope this helps, GOD BLESS! :-)
Answer is A !... Yeah,it’s A
In contract law, undue influence differs from duress in that duress includes improper threat which is missing in undue influence. Duress is the use of any kind of threat, force or psychological pressure in order to dominate someone and make him take decisions against his will. The two principal categories of duress are physical and economic duress.
Physical duress is when one party uses a threat of bodily harm or death to make another party agree to a certain contract. Physical duress can be inflicted on individuals as well as goods. Economic duress is when any type of economic pressure is used by a party to force the other party to enter into an illegal contract which they would not have agreed to otherwise.
Giving someone life threats if they do not perform a given task is an example of duress.
To learn more about duress here
brainly.com/question/14781717
#SPJ4
Answer: Normative ethics would generally ask what right action is. ... Metaethics, on the other hand, would call into question what it means to say that any action is "correct", whether this type of evaluation is objective or subjective, universal or particular
Explanation :
Answer:
they were racist
Explanation:
but the real answer would be: i guess since they'd be free?
