Progressive tax. Literally just reviewed this lesson in my econ class lol.
Answer:
Explained below.
Explanation:
In option (a) no it does not contribute to the US GDP in any year. The transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption and a decrease in net exports that offset. According to option (b) yes it contributes to US GDP in 2013. The transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in net exports offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (c), the transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption in 2014 offset by a decrease in net exports. Option (d) represents the transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in consumption offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (e) yes, it contributes $1000 to US GDP in 2014. The $6000 purchase price exceeds the price paid by the used car dealer. The difference represents value added by the dealership - this is a service that should be counted as part of GDP.
Answer:
It seems that someinformation is missing, nevertheless, it is possible to calculate the market value of the firm if you have the total number of shares.
Explanation:
In this case, if the question says that the "outstanding shares" haven't changed, it means that the total number of shares neither, therefore it is possible to get the market value by multiplying $180 (the stock price for 1 share) per the total number of shares
Answer:
40th unit = 0.11 hr
80th unit = 0.06 hr
160th unit = 0.03 hr
Explanation:
Given :
Learning rate = 60% = 0.6 (r)
Now using the learning curve equation,
where b is = -0.833
Now
= 2.5
For 40th unit
= 0.11 hrs
For 80th unit
= 0.06 hrs
For 160th unit
= 0.03 hr