You can compare the reactions to the townshend acts with reactions to the stamp act since people decided protest for both acts. Townshend Acts<span> did not create an instant uproar like the </span>Stamp Act. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
In what is now and then alluded to as the "
Upset of 1800 Vice President Thomas Jefferson of the Democratic-Republican Party crushed occupant President John Adams of the Federalist Party. The political race was a political realignment that introduced an age of Democratic-Republican administration.
<span>Good Morning!
In her 1920s text, Olive Schreiner, a socialist and feminist from South Africa, pointed out that the country's main problem lay in the absence of unity. This was, she said, the main point of convergence that should be pursued by all South Africans: to achieve national unity, regardless of nationality and ethnicity.
Hugs!</span>
Actually why argue about the speed limit. It is there for everyone's protection. It is there for a good reason. So why argue about it? Yes some people don't follow it. But that is the job of a police officer not of some kids in 6th grade. My point is don't argue against it argue for it.
A. Central Asian armies under the Mongols repeatedly invaded and conquered parts of the Muslim world.
During the European Middle Ages, the Asian and Muslim Empires were reaching a peak of advancement and empire building.
The Muslim Empires experienced invasions and war with the Mongols in an attempt to expand the Mongol Empire. Much of the conquest centered on gaining access to trade routes and creating power through the access to resources. The Mongols were fierce warriors who studied the places they were attacking and used modern weaponry to advance their empire. The empire at its peak of size stretched from China to eastern Europe and south to India.
