Answer:
1. Copyright.
2. Songs and books.
Explanation:
A copyright law can be defined as a set of formal rules granted by a government to protect an intellectual property by giving the owner an exclusive right to use while preventing any unauthorized access, use or duplication by others.
For example, when an individual downloads a song owned by any record company without paying a purchase fee, it is a violation of copyright law.
A copyright can be defined as an exclusive legal right granted to the owner of a creative work (intellectual property) to perform, print, record, and publish his or her work. Also, the owner is granted the sole right to authorize any other person to use the creative work.
Hence, copyright is a kind of rules that protect everyone’s rights when we use each other’s content.
An intellectual property can be defined as an intangible creation of the human mind, ideas, thoughts or intelligence. Some examples of an intellectual property are songs, books, poems, technology, design etc.
Alternative 1:A small D-cache with a hit rate of 94% and a hit access time of 1 cycle (assume that no additional cycles on top of the baseline CPI are added to the execution on a cache hit in this case).Alternative 2: A larger D-cache with a hit rate of 98% and the hit access time of 2 cycles (assume that every memory instruction that hits into the cache adds one additional cycle on top of the baseline CPI). a)[10%] Estimate the CPI metric for both of these designs and determine which of these two designsprovides better performance. Explain your answers!CPI = # Cycles / # InsnLet X = # InsnCPI = # Cycles / XAlternative 1:# Cycles = 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.94*2 + 0.06*150)CPI= 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.94*2 + 0.06*150) / X1= X(0.50*2 + 0.50(0.94*2 + 0.06*150) ) / X= 0.50*2 + 0.50(0.94*2 + 0.06*150)= 6.44Alternative 2:# Cycles = 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)CPI= 0.50*X*2 + 0.50*X(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150) / X2= X(0.50*2 + 0.50(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)) / X= 0.50*2 + 0.50(0.98*(2+1) + 0.02*150)= 3.97Alternative 2 has a lower CPI, therefore Alternative 2 provides better performance.
When resizing an image or an object in a presentation, a user should not utilize the sizing handles in the middle of the sides or the bottom of the image. There's nothing wrong with resizing this way.
There's nothing wrong with resizing this way
<u>Explanation:</u>
When the sizing handles in the middle of the sides are used, the image stretches out reflecting an increase in the width maintaining There's nothing wrong with resizing this way.
On the other hand, while using the sizing handles at the bottom, the image increases in height whilst maintaining the same width again disturbing the aspect ratio.
