Yes, its true, the malcolm baldrige national quality award considers a company's business results but iso 9000:2000 registration does not.
The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award is the highest level of national recognition for performance excellence that a U.S. organization can receive. Customer outcomes.
The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award was established by Congress to push improved quality of products and services in U.S. companies and organizations.
The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) is a reward established by the U.S. Congress in 1987 to boost awareness of quality management and recognize U.S. companies that have implemented successful quality management systems. The award is the nation's highest presidential honor for performance excellence.
GBMC Greater Baltimore center – 2020 Baldrige Award Winner. GBMC Greater Baltimore middle won the Baldrige Award in 2020. GBMC HealthCare System provides inpatient and outpatient care through its hospital and GBMC Health Partners.
The first version of the factors was published in 1988. The primary time for the Core Values was 1991. They were initially "Key Concepts". The title was changed to "Core Values and Concepts" in 1992 which remains the official title today.
learn more about Malcolm Baldrige: brainly.com/question/13979121
#SPJ4
Answer:
The account "Warranty Liability":
is adjusted at the end of the year
True-No conflict will exist between the NPV and IRR methods, when used to evaluate two equally risky but mutually exclusive projects, if the projects' cost of capital exceeds the rate at which the projects' NPV profiles cross.
<h3>
What is NPV and IRR methods?</h3>
While the IRR approach calculates the projected percentage return, the NPV method produces the predicted dollar worth of a project.
Purpose. The breakeven cash flow level of a project is the emphasis of the IRR approach while project surpluses are the subject of the NPV method.
assistance with decisions. Since it provides a dollar return, the NPV approach delivers an outcome that serves as the basis for an investment decision. The IRR approach is not helpful in making this choice because its percentage return does not indicate to the investor how much money will be produced.
Reinvestment rate. When NPV is utilized, the firm's cost of capital is the assumed rate of return for reinvesting intermediate cash flows; when it is the internal rate of return.
To learn more about NPV and IRR methods from the given link:
brainly.com/question/21241533
#SPJ4
Answer:
Both Hillyland and Flatland will be better off in a win-win solution if they engage in comparative advantage.
Explanation:
Suppose each nation decides to specialize in the most suitable crop, and trade with the other nation for the other product, the trade-offs will be the products they supposedly can produce but do not have comparative advantage in. For Hillyland it will be rice and for Flatland it will be coffee.
When both nations practice comparative advantage there will be no losers because economic theory suggests that, when countries practice comparative advantage, the sum total of their combined output will be greater than if they had produced all products themselves because they wanted to be self sufficient.
The logic is simple, goods are less costly to produce in a country that has comparative advantage and at the end they could be sold cheaper to the country that traded it off.
