Answer:
$16,500
Explanation:
Note: Work In Process simply mean the cost of Job which is not complete.
Work In Process = Direct Materials + Direct Labor + Overhead Cost
Work In Process = $3,000 + $4,500 + ($4,500*200%)
Work In Process = $3,000 + $4,500 + $9,000
Work In Process = $16,500
So, the balance in the Work in Process account at the end of September relative to Job A3B is $16,500.
Answer:
A court will most likely;
1. Allows the parties to rescind the contract.
Explanation:
The contract includes all the costs of insuring and shipping the painting from France to New York.
Since, the agent that made the shipping estimate makes a mistake when adding up the costs and, as a result, the shipping cost listed in the contract is $1,000 less than the actual shipping costs. A court will most likely allow the parties to rescind the contract because a part of the contract agreement has been breached in error.
Answer:
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
Explanation:
The best statement which explains the above scenario is 'post hoc, ergo propter hoc'. This statement is known as an informal fallacy, according to this statement because burglaries were followed by an increase in ice-cream sales then it means that an increase in ice-cream sales is the cause of burglaries. In other words, if 'y' is followed by 'x' then 'x' must have caused 'y'.
Answer:
option a because it increase the better knowledge of rain forest plant
